Manufacturer of grinding equipment · Illinois

Modern Process Equipment Inc

Chicago, IL · ~88 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Modern Process Equipment Inc runs at 42% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Manufacturer of grinding equipment workplace, earning a grade A.

Modern Process Equipment Inc: 1.4 TCR = 42% of Manufacturer of grinding equipment BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Modern Process Equipment Inc safety composite

Modern Process Equipment Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2016→2024

Modern Process Equipment Inc injury rate improved

Modern Process Equipment Inc's TCR fell 1.0 from 3.9 in 2016 to 2.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 2.09× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.9 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.9 · 2023=1.0 · 2024=2.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333241 · Chicago, IL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 42% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #2/17
  • PHOTO Sovereign Flavors Inc.
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~88 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sovereign Flavors Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Modern Process Equipment Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Modern Process Equipment Inc averages 1.4 TCR (42% of the Manufacturer of grinding equipment BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Modern Process Equipment Inc TCR series: 2016=3.9 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.9 · 2023=1 · 2024=2.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Modern Process Equipment Inc falls in its industry

215 Manufacturer of grinding equip establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 17 Manufacturer of grinding equip employers in Illinois.

Modern Process Equipment Inc (88 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Modern Process Equipment Inc
Modern Process Equipment Inc (88 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Modern Process Equipment Inc has more employees than the Manufacturer of grinding equipment median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.9 2.9 3 0 0
2023 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2021 1.9 0.0 1 1 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.9 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333241 · IL · Chicago

215 Manufacturer of grinding equipment employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sovereign Flavors Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMS, LLC 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heat and Control Lititz 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR JBT Food Tech 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE ENGIE Distributed Solar and Storage 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE 72E - Western N - IL Electric Ops 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Western N - IL Electric Ops 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crystal Lake Reporting Center 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago Public Schools 49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago/Corporate 18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Illinois at Chicago 13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Service UIC UIC Campus 12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR City of Preston 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Fabcor Inc 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Pratt (Rockwall Corrugating) LLC 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Elm Electrical Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Binghamton Precast & Supply Corp. 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Solar Atmospheres Inc. 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lovegreen Industrial Services, Inc 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pratt Paper (KY), LLC. 88 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.