Railway construction (e.g., interlocker, roadbed, signal, track) · Colorado

Modern Railway Systems - Home Office

Littleton, CO · ~22 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Modern Railway Systems - Home Office runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Railway construction (e.g., interlocker, roadbed, signal, track) workplace, earning a grade C.

Modern Railway Systems - Home Office: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Railway construction (e.g., interlocker, roadbed, signal, track) BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Modern Railway Systems - Home Office safety composite

Modern Railway Systems - Home Office scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Modern Railway Systems - Home Office held a steady TCR band

Modern Railway Systems - Home Office's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 0.0 TCR.

2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237990 · Littleton, CO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/26
  • PHOTO The Goettle Company
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Goettle Company (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Modern Railway Systems - Home Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Modern Railway Systems - Home Office averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Railway construction (e.g., interlocker, roadbed, signal, track) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Modern Railway Systems - Home Office TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Modern Railway Systems - Home Office falls in its industry

932 Railway construction (e.g., in establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 26 Railway construction (e.g., in employers in Colorado.

Modern Railway Systems - Home Office (22 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Modern Railway Systems - Home Office
Modern Railway Systems - Home Office (22 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Modern Railway Systems - Home Office has fewer employees than the Railway construction (e.g., interlocker, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237990 · CO · Littleton

932 Railway construction (e.g., interlocker, roadbed, signal, track) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 238 employers in Littleton, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Goettle Company 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Turner at Sasol North America Westlake LA 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Olin Corporation Freeport TX 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Standard Constructors, Inc. 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jack's Bean Company LLC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ponderosa Partnership LLC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allied Demolition, Inc 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE San Isabel Electric Association- Pueblo West Administration 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Waterton Campus (1004) 5,542 FTE
CITY-NEAR Littleton Adventist Hospital 1,563 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US CO Littleton Deer Crk Cnyn (1003) 1,335 FTE
CITY-NEAR AdventHealth Littleton 1,174 FTE
NAT-TCR US Foods, Inc. Rosemont 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Conway 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Matt Bowers Nissan EasternShore 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Matt Bowers Ford Metairie 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Martins Collision Center 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gunter, TX - 1750 Wall Street Rd 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cartersville, GA - 100 Riverpoint Road 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Affinity Agriculture LLC 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.