General warehousing and storage · Michigan

Modular Automotive Systems Dequindre

Warren, MI · ~144 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Modular Automotive Systems Dequindre runs at 30% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade A.

Modular Automotive Systems Dequindre: 1.7 TCR = 30% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Modular Automotive Systems Dequindre safety composite

Modular Automotive Systems Dequindre scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Modular Automotive Systems Dequindre: 1.1 → 2.4 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 2.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.35× in 2024

Modular Automotive Systems Dequindre's TCR rose 1.2 from 1.1 in 2021 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Warren, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.7 · 30% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #40/194
  • PHOTO ACCO Brands - Boonev…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~144 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ACCO Brands - Booneville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Modular Automotive Systems Dequindre in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Modular Automotive Systems Dequindre averages 1.7 TCR (30% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Modular Automotive Systems Dequindre TCR series: 2021=1.1 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 5.8

Where Modular Automotive Systems Dequindre falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #40 safest of 194 General warehousing and storag employers in Michigan.

Modular Automotive Systems Dequindre (144 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Modular Automotive Systems Dequindre
Modular Automotive Systems Dequindre (144 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Modular Automotive Systems Dequindre has more employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2023 2.6 2.6 3 0 0
2022 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2021 1.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · MI · Warren

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 290 employers in Warren, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ACCO Brands - Booneville 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Montgomery Distribution Center 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 62038 CAPSTONE - USF CHARLOTTE NC 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1549 GEODIS LOGISTICS 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sozo Health Inc 144 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schreiber Corporation 144 FTE
STATE-SIZE Leprino Foods, Remus 144 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arnie's Bakery 144 FTE
CITY-NEAR Warren Technical Center 22,693 FTE
CITY-NEAR GM Global Technical Center 21,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR Warren Truck Assembly Plant 3,804 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-MIDET153 1,903 FTE
NAT-TCR QuantumClean - Scarborough 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Mukwonago 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - MCI5 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Niello Acura - Roseville 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Eastern Lift Truck Co., Inc. Br9 144 FTE
NAT-SIZE Equipment Depot Texas, Inc. - Dallas/Ft. Worth 144 FTE
NAT-SIZE Universal Forest Products Union City LLC 144 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jo Ellen Smith Living Center 144 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.