Truck bodies assembling on purchased chassis · Texas

Module Truck Systems, Inc. - Lubbock

Lubbock, TX · ~32 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Module Truck Systems, Inc. - Lubbock runs at 201% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Truck bodies assembling on purchased chassis workplace, earning a grade F.

Module Truck Systems, Inc. - Lubbock: 6.6 TCR = 201% of Truck bodies assembling on purchased chassis BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Module Truck Systems, Inc. - Lubbock safety composite

Module Truck Systems, Inc. - Lubbock scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.6

2016→2024

Module Truck Systems, Inc. - Lubbock injury rate improved

Module Truck Systems, Inc. - Lubbock's TCR fell 11.6 from 16.3 in 2016 to 4.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 16.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=16.3 · 2017=7.2 · 2018=7.0 · 2019=8.0 · 2020=6.5 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=8.0 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=4.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336211 · Lubbock, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.6 · 201% of ind

  • DART 4.6 DART
  • RANK #22/26
  • PHOTO Galion Godwin Truck …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Galion Godwin Truck Body (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Module Truck Systems, Inc. - Lubbock in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Module Truck Systems, Inc. - Lubbock averages 6.6 TCR (201% of the Truck bodies assembling on purchased chassis BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Module Truck Systems, Inc. - Lubbock TCR series: 2016=16.3 · 2017=7.2 · 2018=7 · 2019=8 · 2020=6.5 · 2021=0 · 2022=8 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=4.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Module Truck Systems, Inc. - Lubbock falls in its industry

470 Truck bodies assembling on pur establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 26 Truck bodies assembling on pur employers in Texas.

Module Truck Systems, Inc. - Lubbock (32 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 5.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Module Truck Systems, Inc. - Lubbock
Module Truck Systems, Inc. - Lubbock (32 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 5.5

Module Truck Systems, Inc. - Lubbock has fewer employees than the Truck bodies assembling on purchased cha median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.6 4.6 1 0 0
2023 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2022 8.0 5.3 3 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 6.5 6.5 2 0 0
2019 8.0 8.0 2 0 0
2018 7.0 7.0 2 0 0
2017 7.2 3.6 2 0 0
2016 16.3 16.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336211 · TX · Lubbock

470 Truck bodies assembling on purchased chassis employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 482 employers in Lubbock, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Galion Godwin Truck Body 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mallaghan GSE (GA) Inc. 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2357_4303 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMERICAN TRUCK & TRAILER BODY CO., INC. 6.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Heifer Ranch at Arroyo Seco, LTD 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE El Coyote Ranch 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Green Plains Cattle Company LLC- Tulia 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Feather Crest Farm 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR A01 Covenant Medical Center 3,178 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2004-20049000 2,269 FTE
CITY-NEAR FALCON HEALTHCARE INC DBA INTERIM HEALTHCARE 2,046 FTE
CITY-NEAR Covenant Health System 1,761 FTE
NAT-TCR Lebanon 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR AdventHealth Palm Coast 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR The Fresh Market 045 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR The Kansas City Marriott Downtown 6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Arcotech - PC 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vcf 123 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fatburger - #242 Excalibur 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Technoform Glass Insulation 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.