Distribution line, sewer and water, construction · North Carolina

Moffat Pipe, Inc.

Wake Forest, NC · ~66 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Moffat Pipe, Inc. runs at 60% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Distribution line, sewer and water, construction workplace, earning a grade B.

Moffat Pipe, Inc.: 1.7 TCR = 60% of Distribution line, sewer and water, construction BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Moffat Pipe, Inc. safety composite

Moffat Pipe, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2016→2024

Moffat Pipe, Inc. injury rate improved

Moffat Pipe, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.3 from 2.3 in 2016 to 0.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.3 · 2017=6.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Wake Forest, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 60% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #14/55
  • PHOTO SGS Contracting Serv…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SGS Contracting Services, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Moffat Pipe, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Moffat Pipe, Inc. averages 1.7 TCR (60% of the Distribution line, sewer and water, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Moffat Pipe, Inc. TCR series: 2016=2.3 · 2017=6 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=0.9 · BLS 2.8

Where Moffat Pipe, Inc. falls in its industry

1,614 Distribution line, sewer and w establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 55 Distribution line, sewer and w employers in North Carolina.

Moffat Pipe, Inc. (66 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Moffat Pipe, Inc.
Moffat Pipe, Inc. (66 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Moffat Pipe, Inc. has more employees than the Distribution line, sewer and water, cons median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2023 1.8 1.8 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.9 2.6 3 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 6.0 4.0 3 0 0
2016 2.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · NC · Wake Forest

1,614 Distribution line, sewer and water, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 67 employers in Wake Forest, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SGS Contracting Services, Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR S Thomas Construction, LLC 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Glenwood Road Project 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mountain Tunnel Constructors, Inc 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Clinton Field Services 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Riverbend Steam Station 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Salisbury Operations Center 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE ASHEVILLE OPERATIONS 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lakeside Environmental Consultants, LLC 486 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5254 399 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wegmans Wake Forest 145 354 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5254 326 FTE
NAT-TCR BASF Mauldin 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Pardeeville, WI - 11 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant Eagle #0179 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Lpkc Bnsf 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Drug Plastics and Glass Co., Inc. - Kittanning, PA 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Columbus PDC 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sterling 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Delaware Court Healthcare Center 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.