Employer · Arizona

mohave_county_administration

Kingman, AZ · ~298 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

mohave_county_administration runs at 37% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade A.

mohave_county_administration: 1.2 TCR = 37% of industry BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

mohave_county_administration safety composite

mohave_county_administration scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 55%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
C 0

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

mohave_county_administration: 0.8 → 1.6 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 1.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.67× in 2017

mohave_county_administration's TCR rose 0.8 from 0.8 in 2016 to 1.6 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921140 · Kingman, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 37% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK P87
  • PHOTO ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~298 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

mohave_county_administration in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows mohave_county_administration averages 1.2 TCR (37% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

mohave_county_administration TCR series: 2016=0.8 · 2017=1.6 · BLS 3.2

Where mohave_county_administration falls in its industry

239 industry establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
mohave_county_administration (298 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 282 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate mohave_county_administration
mohave_county_administration (298 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 282 employees and a TCR of 4.8

mohave_county_administration has more employees than the industry median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 1.6 0.8 4 0 0
2016 0.8 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921140 · AZ · Kingman

239 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 135 employers in Kingman, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR HEALTH DEPARTMENT 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heath Department 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR JUSTICE INTEGRATION SERVICES 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Flex Technology Group 298 FTE
STATE-SIZE 122000 - Retail Operations Center - ROC 298 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hilty's Electrical Contracting 299 FTE
STATE-SIZE Price Industries 297 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kingman Healthcare Inc. 1,939 FTE
CITY-NEAR American Woodmark Coorporation, Kingman AZ Plant 568 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2051 508 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2051 448 FTE
NAT-TCR Dallastown Operating Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Egg Harbor Facility 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Ryerson- Lansing 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Industrial Park 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tukwila (Waken) 298 FTE
NAT-SIZE Yorktown (Nyyor) 298 FTE
NAT-SIZE Acute Care Hospital 298 FTE
NAT-SIZE Realty Operations Group 298 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.