Private warehousing and storage, general merchandise · Maryland

Mohawk Industries: Glen Burnie MD WHS #JSD

Odenton, MD · ~40 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mohawk Industries: Glen Burnie MD WHS #JSD runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Private warehousing and storage, general merchandise workplace, earning a grade B.

Mohawk Industries: Glen Burnie MD WHS #JSD: 3.4 TCR = 58% of Private warehousing and storage, general merchandise BLS 5.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mohawk Industries: Glen Burnie MD WHS #JSD safety composite

Mohawk Industries: Glen Burnie MD WHS #JSD scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Mohawk Industries: Glen Burnie MD WHS #JSD: 3.1 → 3.7 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 3.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.09× in 2024

Mohawk Industries: Glen Burnie MD WHS #JSD's TCR rose 0.6 from 3.1 in 2023 to 3.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.09× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Odenton, MD AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.4 · 58% of ind

  • DART 3.7 DART
  • RANK #53/148
  • PHOTO 30031 CAPSTONE - ADU…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 30031 CAPSTONE - ADUSA (DRY) DC10 SALISBURY NC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Mohawk Industries: Glen Burnie MD WHS #JSD in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mohawk Industries: Glen Burnie MD WHS #JSD averages 3.4 TCR (58% of the Private warehousing and storage, general merchandise BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mohawk Industries: Glen Burnie MD WHS #JSD TCR series: 2023=3.1 · 2024=3.7 · BLS 5.8

Where Mohawk Industries: Glen Burnie MD WHS #JSD falls in its industry

9,477 Private warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #53 safest of 148 Private warehousing and storag employers in Maryland.

Mohawk Industries: Glen Burnie MD WHS #JSD (40 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Mohawk Industries: Glen Burnie MD WHS #JSD
Mohawk Industries: Glen Burnie MD WHS #JSD (40 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Mohawk Industries: Glen Burnie MD WHS #JSD has fewer employees than the Private warehousing and storage, general median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.7 3.7 1 0 0
2023 3.1 3.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · MD · Odenton

9,477 Private warehousing and storage, general merchandise employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 35 employers in Odenton, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 30031 CAPSTONE - ADUSA (DRY) DC10 SALISBURY NC 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Thermo Fisher Scientific Frederick MD (Distribution) 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Point S Tire Portland 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR National Distribution Centers LLC-5140 Santa Ana Street 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Chalk Point Generating Station 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Revolution Solar 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE CFM/Severn Associates JV 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hamilton Pacific Chamberlain, LLC 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR VarcoMac LLC 622 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4106 SOUTH CENTRAL-ODENTON MD 240 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ferguson Trenching Company Inc 208 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2662-4106 198 FTE
NAT-TCR Cucamonga Plant 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR San Antonio Plant 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR ITW Residential & Renovation - Bartlett 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR INDIANAPOLIS 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Livingston 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peninsula Steel Inc 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ivey Residential, LLC 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dakota Spirit AgEnergy, LLC 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.