Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services · New York

Mohawk Labor Services

Clifton Park, NY · ~141 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mohawk Labor Services runs at 143% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade D.

Mohawk Labor Services: 3.0 TCR = 143% of Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mohawk Labor Services safety composite

Mohawk Labor Services scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Mohawk Labor Services: 0.8 → 2.2 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 4.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Mohawk Labor Services's TCR rose 1.4 from 0.8 in 2020 to 2.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Clifton Park, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 3.0 · 143% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #31/67
  • PHOTO Crown Lift Trucks Sp…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~141 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Crown Lift Trucks Springfield (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Mohawk Labor Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mohawk Labor Services averages 3.0 TCR (143% of the Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mohawk Labor Services TCR series: 2020=0.8 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=4.8 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=2.2 · BLS 2.1

Where Mohawk Labor Services falls in its industry

2,560 Commercial and industrial mach establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 67 Commercial and industrial mach employers in New York.

Mohawk Labor Services (141 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Mohawk Labor Services
Mohawk Labor Services (141 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Mohawk Labor Services has more employees than the Commercial and industrial machinery repa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.2 0.0 3 1 0
2023 3.1 1.3 5 0 0
2022 4.8 1.4 10 0 0
2021 4.1 2.4 7 0 0
2020 0.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · NY · Clifton Park

2,560 Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 63 employers in Clifton Park, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Crown Lift Trucks Springfield 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sandvik Brier Hill 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crown Lift Trucks Joliet 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Altorfer Inc. - East Peoria, IL - 1 Capitol Drive 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE 90004050-Farley Trail Hall JV 141 FTE
STATE-SIZE Peckham Road Corp 141 FTE
STATE-SIZE Palatial Concrete Ltd. 141 FTE
STATE-SIZE BAY SHORE NY DEPOT 141 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2844 432 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2844 414 FTE
CITY-NEAR US Foods Albany 313 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSW #112 283 FTE
NAT-TCR Levante Brewing Company 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 50 Christiana 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR ITW- Global Tool Unit- Libertyville 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Gerdau Fort Smith Mill 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Thomas Industrial Coatings Inc. & Thomas Equipment and Management 141 FTE
NAT-SIZE St John Lutheran Home 141 FTE
NAT-SIZE Modern Plumbing Industries, Inc. 141 FTE
NAT-SIZE Forever Nutraceutical, LLC 141 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.