Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) · California

Moiola Brothers Cattle Feeders, Ltd.

Brawley, CA · ~38 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Moiola Brothers Cattle Feeders, Ltd. runs at 52% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) workplace, earning a grade B.

Moiola Brothers Cattle Feeders, Ltd.: 2.4 TCR = 52% of Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Moiola Brothers Cattle Feeders, Ltd. safety composite

Moiola Brothers Cattle Feeders, Ltd. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.7

2022→2024

Moiola Brothers Cattle Feeders, Ltd. injury rate improved

Moiola Brothers Cattle Feeders, Ltd.'s TCR fell 4.7 from 4.7 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=4.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 112112 · Brawley, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 52% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/5
  • PHOTO Coyote Lake Feedyard…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Coyote Lake Feedyard Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Moiola Brothers Cattle Feeders, Ltd. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Moiola Brothers Cattle Feeders, Ltd. averages 2.4 TCR (52% of the Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Moiola Brothers Cattle Feeders, Ltd. TCR series: 2022=4.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Moiola Brothers Cattle Feeders, Ltd. falls in its industry

165 Beef cattle feedlots (except s establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 5 Beef cattle feedlots (except s employers in California.

Moiola Brothers Cattle Feeders, Ltd. (38 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 5.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Moiola Brothers Cattle Feeders, Ltd.
Moiola Brothers Cattle Feeders, Ltd. (38 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 5.4

Moiola Brothers Cattle Feeders, Ltd. has fewer employees than the Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.7 2.4 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

112112 · CA · Brawley

165 Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 47 employers in Brawley, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Coyote Lake Feedyard Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR XIT Feeders 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR SOUTHWEST FEED YARD 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR HERD CO 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE CAL-O SHIPPING 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE GAR & S Farm Labor Services, Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Supreme Almonds of California, Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bays Ranch Inc 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 355 1,170 FTE
CITY-NEAR One World Beef Packers LLC 901 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pioneers Memorial Healthcare District 866 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sonia Corina, Inc. 835 FTE
NAT-TCR Transcontinental Packaging Menasha 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR McNaughton-McKay Electric Company - Ohio Region - Columbus, OH 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR SummitBHC LLC Henryville 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Eastgate 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Landings of Oak Island 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Strober-Wright Roofing Inc. 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tavares LLC 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Management Services 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.