Folding boxes (except corrugated) made from purchased paperboard · California

Molino Company DBA Melcast Litho

Cerritos, CA · ~37 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Molino Company DBA Melcast Litho runs at 26% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Folding boxes (except corrugated) made from purchased paperboard workplace, earning a grade A.

Molino Company DBA Melcast Litho: 0.9 TCR = 26% of Folding boxes (except corrugated) made from purchased paperboard BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Molino Company DBA Melcast Litho safety composite

Molino Company DBA Melcast Litho scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Molino Company DBA Melcast Litho: 0.0 → 2.2 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 2.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Molino Company DBA Melcast Litho's TCR rose 2.2 from 0.0 in 2017 to 2.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322212 · Cerritos, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 26% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/19
  • PHOTO Franklin
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Franklin (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Molino Company DBA Melcast Litho in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Molino Company DBA Melcast Litho averages 0.9 TCR (26% of the Folding boxes (except corrugated) made from purchased paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Molino Company DBA Melcast Litho TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=2.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Molino Company DBA Melcast Litho falls in its industry

205 Folding boxes (except corrugat establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 19 Folding boxes (except corrugat employers in California.

Molino Company DBA Melcast Litho (37 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 2.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Molino Company DBA Melcast Litho
Molino Company DBA Melcast Litho (37 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 2.2

Molino Company DBA Melcast Litho has fewer employees than the Folding boxes (except corrugated) made f median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.2 0.0 1 0 0
2023 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322212 · CA · Cerritos

205 Folding boxes (except corrugated) made from purchased paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 126 employers in Cerritos, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Franklin 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR CCL Specialty Cartons 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lawrenceburg TN 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2428 Eutaw Folding 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE BULLSEYE FARMS LLC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE KP Spraying LLC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE KAN - 01 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kimberlina Shop 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 483 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 616 2,127 FTE
CITY-NEAR CACER - CERRITOS HUB 1,981 FTE
CITY-NEAR CERRITOS HUB (CACER) 1,916 FTE
NAT-TCR Moulded Pulp, a division of Cascades Holding, Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR INDICOM Electric Company LLC 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR HQ 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Piedmont Resin Supply, LLC 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bonney Lake Branch 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE TW Metals - Cranbury 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jabezco Industrial Group, Inc. 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE HOT Graphics 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.