General freight trucking, local · Michigan

Mondelez Global - Farmington DSD

Farmington, MI · ~38 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mondelez Global - Farmington DSD runs at 193% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General freight trucking, local workplace, earning a grade D.

Mondelez Global - Farmington DSD: 8.7 TCR = 193% of General freight trucking, local BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mondelez Global - Farmington DSD safety composite

Mondelez Global - Farmington DSD scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2017→2024

Mondelez Global - Farmington DSD injury rate improved

Mondelez Global - Farmington DSD's TCR fell 1.5 from 4.3 in 2017 to 2.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 15.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.3 · 2018=10.7 · 2019=15.4 · 2020=8.3 · 2021=12.9 · 2022=6.4 · 2023=8.7 · 2024=2.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484110 · Farmington, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 8.7 · 193% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #96/103
  • PHOTO Coastal Service Expr…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Coastal Service Express, Inc. PNS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Mondelez Global - Farmington DSD in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mondelez Global - Farmington DSD averages 8.7 TCR (193% of the General freight trucking, local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mondelez Global - Farmington DSD TCR series: 2017=4.3 · 2018=10.7 · 2019=15.4 · 2020=8.3 · 2021=12.9 · 2022=6.4 · 2023=8.7 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 4.5

Where Mondelez Global - Farmington DSD falls in its industry

2,784 General freight trucking, loca establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #96 safest of 103 General freight trucking, loca employers in Michigan.

Mondelez Global - Farmington DSD (38 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Mondelez Global - Farmington DSD
Mondelez Global - Farmington DSD (38 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Mondelez Global - Farmington DSD has fewer employees than the General freight trucking, local median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2023 8.7 4.4 4 0 0
2022 6.4 6.4 3 0 0
2021 12.9 12.9 6 0 0
2020 8.3 6.2 4 0 0
2019 15.4 15.4 7 0 0
2018 10.7 8.5 5 0 0
2017 4.3 4.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484110 · MI · Farmington

2,784 General freight trucking, local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 35 employers in Farmington, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Coastal Service Express, Inc. PNS 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Magnolia Logistics, Inc. 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR DCC : 5888-00 MOBIS-BHC-DCC/Jamesburg, NJ 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR VA_Manassas_7375 8.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Westview Orchards 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE C3 Industries, Inc - Webberville (Indoor) 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Great Lakes Packing Co. Kewadin 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE McConnell & Scully, Inc. 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maxfield Education Center 1,353 FTE
CITY-NEAR Administration Building/ CO 1,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gill Elementary 1,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR Longacre Elementary 1,317 FTE
NAT-TCR Howard Roofing main office 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Obion County Plant 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Albina Co. 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Benjamin Franklin School 8.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Alamo Dairy Farms LLC 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Terminix SEVA Inc 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Multiplex Display Fixture Company 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tasman Industries, Inc. 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.