Commercial building construction general contractors · Ohio

Mondo Building & Excavating

Marietta, OH · ~38 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.9
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mondo Building & Excavating runs at 377% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Commercial building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

Mondo Building & Excavating: 10.9 TCR = 377% of Commercial building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mondo Building & Excavating safety composite

Mondo Building & Excavating scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.1

2016→2019

Mondo Building & Excavating injury rate improved

Mondo Building & Excavating's TCR fell 5.1 from 19.1 in 2016 to 14.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 19.1 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=19.1 · 2017=8.1 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=14.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Marietta, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.9 · 377% of ind

  • DART 7.0 DART
  • RANK #217/220
  • PHOTO Borton Construction,…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Borton Construction, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Mondo Building & Excavating in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mondo Building & Excavating averages 10.9 TCR (377% of the Commercial building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mondo Building & Excavating TCR series: 2016=19.1 · 2017=8.1 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=14 · BLS 2.9

Where Mondo Building & Excavating falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #217 safest of 220 Commercial building constructi employers in Ohio.

Mondo Building & Excavating (38 employees, TCR 10.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Mondo Building & Excavating
Mondo Building & Excavating (38 employees, TCR 10.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Mondo Building & Excavating has fewer employees than the Commercial building construction general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 14.0 7.0 6 0 0
2018 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2017 8.1 8.1 3 0 0
2016 19.1 16.7 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · OH · Marietta

4,692 Commercial building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 105 employers in Marietta, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Borton Construction, Inc. 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rhom Construction LLC 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northwest Builders, Inc. 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR GoodLand Landscape Construction, Inc. 10.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Verano OH CPG - Mothers Grow Best 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Green Velvet Sod Farms 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pride Transportation Co, Inc 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Union City 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Health System Main Campus 1,787 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parkersbug 1,686 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thermo Fisher Scientific Marietta, OH (LPD) 566 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thermo Fisher Scientific (Asheville), LLC 561 FTE
NAT-TCR Superior Grocers # 120 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Honouliuli Wastewater Treatment Plant 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Chicago Plastic Systems, Inc 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Pitman Creek Wholesale 10.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE ABQ-ALBUQUERQUE 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greenville Parts Distribution Center 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Accessories Unlimited, LLC 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE MbarC electric 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.