Awnings, rigid plastics or fiberglass, manufacturing · Ohio

Mondo Polymer Technologies, Inc.

Reno, OH · ~63 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mondo Polymer Technologies, Inc. runs at 192% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Awnings, rigid plastics or fiberglass, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Mondo Polymer Technologies, Inc.: 6.3 TCR = 192% of Awnings, rigid plastics or fiberglass, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mondo Polymer Technologies, Inc. safety composite

Mondo Polymer Technologies, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.0

2019→2024

Mondo Polymer Technologies, Inc. injury rate improved

Mondo Polymer Technologies, Inc.'s TCR fell 4.0 from 7.2 in 2019 to 3.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 10.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=7.2 · 2020=5.9 · 2021=5.1 · 2022=10.6 · 2023=6.1 · 2024=3.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Reno, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.3 · 192% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #221/270
  • PHOTO 3904_7507
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 3904_7507 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Mondo Polymer Technologies, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mondo Polymer Technologies, Inc. averages 6.3 TCR (192% of the Awnings, rigid plastics or fiberglass, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mondo Polymer Technologies, Inc. TCR series: 2019=7.2 · 2020=5.9 · 2021=5.1 · 2022=10.6 · 2023=6.1 · 2024=3.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Mondo Polymer Technologies, Inc. falls in its industry

2,838 Awnings, rigid plastics or fib establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #221 safest of 270 Awnings, rigid plastics or fib employers in Ohio.

Mondo Polymer Technologies, Inc. (63 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mondo Polymer Technologies, Inc.
Mondo Polymer Technologies, Inc. (63 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Mondo Polymer Technologies, Inc. has fewer employees than the Awnings, rigid plastics or fiberglass, m median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.2 3.2 2 0 0
2023 6.1 3.1 4 0 0
2022 10.6 7.6 7 0 0
2021 5.1 3.4 3 0 0
2020 5.9 2.9 4 0 0
2019 7.2 2.9 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · OH · Reno

2,838 Awnings, rigid plastics or fiberglass, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 3 employers in Reno, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 3904_7507 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Commercial Plastics Company 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Action Plastics, Inc 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR HYDRA POOLS, INC - NIOTA 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cleveland 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nicholson Builders 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Buckeye Pipeline Construction, Inc 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE NORTHSTAR ASPHALT, INC. 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mark A. Mondo Building & Excavating 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mondo Building & Excavating 39 FTE
NAT-TCR BrandFX, LLC - Pocahontas 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Gemstar Construction & Development, Inc. 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Dowbuilt Inc 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Alpine Construction Services 6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Waterbury Heating and Cooling, Inc. 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE M-D Building Products Brooklet 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Denny's 9550 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ryder El Paso 9115 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.