Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors · Pennsylvania

Monk Heating and Air Conditioning

Dallas, PA · ~32 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Monk Heating and Air Conditioning runs at 261% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

Monk Heating and Air Conditioning: 7.3 TCR = 261% of Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Monk Heating and Air Conditioning safety composite

Monk Heating and Air Conditioning scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−13.1

2022→2024

Monk Heating and Air Conditioning injury rate improved

Monk Heating and Air Conditioning's TCR fell 13.1 from 13.1 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 13.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=13.1 · 2023=8.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Dallas, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.3 · 261% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #207/268
  • PHOTO Service Unlimited, I…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Service Unlimited, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Monk Heating and Air Conditioning in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Monk Heating and Air Conditioning averages 7.3 TCR (261% of the Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Monk Heating and Air Conditioning TCR series: 2022=13.1 · 2023=8.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Monk Heating and Air Conditioning falls in its industry

5,793 Heating, ventilation and air-c establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #207 safest of 268 Heating, ventilation and air-c employers in Pennsylvania.

Monk Heating and Air Conditioning (32 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Monk Heating and Air Conditioning
Monk Heating and Air Conditioning (32 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Monk Heating and Air Conditioning has fewer employees than the Heating, ventilation and air-conditionin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 8.8 2.9 2 1 0
2022 13.1 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · PA · Dallas

5,793 Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 17 employers in Dallas, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Service Unlimited, Inc. 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mechanical Service Co. Inc. 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR KF Mechanical LLC 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pasterkamp Heating and Air Conditioning Co. 7.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE KNOUSE FRUITLANDS, INC. 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Paramount Mushroom Farms LLC 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wharf 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE DAJ Mushroom 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pulverman 185 FTE
CITY-NEAR 74 177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meadows Nursing & Rehab Center 165 FTE
CITY-NEAR MEADOWS NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER 164 FTE
NAT-TCR Hickory Hills Park District 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Cottonwood Distribution LLC 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Dajcor Aluminum Inc. 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Legacy Wendy's-218 7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE North Side Electric Motors 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE HC Elyria 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE MRC Roofing, LLC 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE T.Maus Grading & Paving Inc 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.