Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) · New Jersey

Monmouth-Ocean Logistics Inc

Red Bank, NJ · ~61 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Monmouth-Ocean Logistics Inc runs at 208% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) workplace, earning a grade F.

Monmouth-Ocean Logistics Inc: 9.3 TCR = 208% of Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Monmouth-Ocean Logistics Inc safety composite

Monmouth-Ocean Logistics Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 9.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
B 3.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−14.3

2022→2024

Monmouth-Ocean Logistics Inc injury rate improved

Monmouth-Ocean Logistics Inc's TCR fell 14.3 from 18.2 in 2022 to 3.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 18.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=18.2 · 2023=6.0 · 2024=3.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492210 · Red Bank, NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.3 · 208% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #20/48
  • PHOTO Alinea Logistics LLC.
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Alinea Logistics LLC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Monmouth-Ocean Logistics Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Monmouth-Ocean Logistics Inc averages 9.3 TCR (208% of the Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Monmouth-Ocean Logistics Inc TCR series: 2022=18.2 · 2023=6 · 2024=3.9 · BLS 4.5

Where Monmouth-Ocean Logistics Inc falls in its industry

1,452 Delivery service (except as pa establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 11.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 48 Delivery service (except as pa employers in New Jersey.

Monmouth-Ocean Logistics Inc (61 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 11.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Monmouth-Ocean Logistics Inc
Monmouth-Ocean Logistics Inc (61 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 11.8

Monmouth-Ocean Logistics Inc has fewer employees than the Delivery service (except as part of inte median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 11.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.9 3.9 2 0 0
2023 6.0 4.0 3 0 0
2022 18.2 18.2 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492210 · NJ · Red Bank

1,452 Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 22 employers in Red Bank, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Alinea Logistics LLC. 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6458-ZSPE 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6458-ZBIR 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR DMH9-ENDV 9.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jersey City 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atlantic City NJ 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mike Fitzpatrick Equipment Company 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE 213-NY-New York City 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR SPAR Field Services 7,072 FTE
CITY-NEAR FDM Associates Inc - SFS 4,790 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverview Medical Center 1,614 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maser Consulting, Red Bank 561 FTE
NAT-TCR Emm-Trace, Inc. 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Boucher Brothers Miami Beach 21 46 St LLC 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Custom Orchards 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Trivista, Inc. 9.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Supreme Casting, Inc. 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2917 Swn103 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hanover Hospital 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jefferson Sprinkler Inc. 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.