Plumbing contractors · Wisconsin

Monona Plumbing & Fire Protection

Madison, WI · ~143 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Monona Plumbing & Fire Protection runs at 132% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Plumbing contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

Monona Plumbing & Fire Protection: 3.7 TCR = 132% of Plumbing contractors BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Monona Plumbing & Fire Protection safety composite

Monona Plumbing & Fire Protection scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Monona Plumbing & Fire Protection: 2.2 → 3.5 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 7.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Monona Plumbing & Fire Protection's TCR rose 1.4 from 2.2 in 2016 to 3.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 7.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Madison, WI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 3.7 · 132% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #67/154
  • PHOTO Don Brandel Plumbing…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 47 inj
  • SIZE ~143 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Don Brandel Plumbing, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Monona Plumbing & Fire Protection in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Monona Plumbing & Fire Protection averages 3.7 TCR (132% of the Plumbing contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Monona Plumbing & Fire Protection TCR series: 2016=2.2 · 2017=4.3 · 2018=5.1 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=3 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=7.2 · 2024=3.5 · BLS 2.8

Where Monona Plumbing & Fire Protection falls in its industry

5,793 Plumbing contractors establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #67 safest of 154 Plumbing contractors employers in Wisconsin.

Monona Plumbing & Fire Protection (143 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Monona Plumbing & Fire Protection
Monona Plumbing & Fire Protection (143 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Monona Plumbing & Fire Protection has more employees than the Plumbing contractors median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.5 0.0 4 0 0
2023 7.2 4.0 9 0 0
2022 2.4 0.8 3 0 0
2021 3.0 0.0 4 0 0
2020 2.9 1.4 4 0 0
2019 2.7 2.0 4 0 0
2018 5.1 1.3 8 0 0
2017 4.3 2.5 7 0 0
2016 2.2 0.5 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · WI · Madison

5,793 Plumbing contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 577 employers in Madison, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Don Brandel Plumbing, Inc. 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fox Mechanical Services 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Williams Plumbing and Heating Missoula 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alliant Systems, LLC 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tri-North Builders 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE CCI-HQ 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE Musson Brothers Inc 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE Zignego Company 143 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary's Hospital - Madison 2,401 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meriter Hospital 2,249 FTE
CITY-NEAR EatStreet 1,659 FTE
CITY-NEAR TDS - Junction Road (All Employees) 1,302 FTE
NAT-TCR Irving Consumer Products 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR McCabe's Mechanical Service, Inc. 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Cardinal Ethanol, LLC 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Cleveland Division 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Landmark Plastic Corporation - Akron Ohio Location 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heritage Freight Corporate Office 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corporate Office 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE lemont center 143 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.