Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Wisconsin

Montgomery Logistics

La Crosse, WI · ~55 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Montgomery Logistics runs at 73% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade B.

Montgomery Logistics: 4.7 TCR = 73% of Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Montgomery Logistics safety composite

Montgomery Logistics scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 4.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
C 5.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Montgomery Logistics: 4.4 → 5.0 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 5.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.06× in 2023

Montgomery Logistics's TCR rose 0.6 from 4.4 in 2022 to 5.0 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.06× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · La Crosse, WI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 4.7 · 73% of ind

  • DART 5.0 DART
  • RANK #16/113
  • PHOTO NYALB - ALBANY
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NYALB - ALBANY (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Montgomery Logistics in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Montgomery Logistics averages 4.7 TCR (73% of the Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Montgomery Logistics TCR series: 2022=4.4 · 2023=5 · BLS 6.5

Where Montgomery Logistics falls in its industry

6,679 Express delivery services (exc establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 113 Express delivery services (exc employers in Wisconsin.

Montgomery Logistics (55 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Montgomery Logistics
Montgomery Logistics (55 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Montgomery Logistics has fewer employees than the Express delivery services (except establ median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.0 5.0 3 0 0
2022 4.4 4.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · WI · La Crosse

6,679 Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 188 employers in La Crosse, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NYALB - ALBANY 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DOK3 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DHO3 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR WYCAP - CASPER CENTER 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Siemers Holstein Farm, Inc. - Main Farm 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Substation 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Luamben Green Service Corp 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE KOHLER SERVICE ORGANIZATION 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gundersen Lutheran Medical Center 3,712 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Health System-Franciscan Healthcare Inc 2,329 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gundersen Clinic, Ltd. 2,127 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gundersen - La Crosse Clinic 1,739 FTE
NAT-TCR Buck Lumber & Building Supply, Inc. 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Burbank Rehabilitation Facility 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Lenexa # 9120 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Unisource Mfg INC 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Functional Coatings LLC Newburyport Facility 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rxr Ny Pm November LLC 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE ORLANDO, FL (Supply Services) 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nye Pointe 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.