Civil engineering services · North Carolina

Moorman Kizer & Reitzel Inc

Fayetteville, NC · ~23 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.3
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Moorman Kizer & Reitzel Inc runs at 2060% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Civil engineering services workplace, earning a grade F.

Moorman Kizer & Reitzel Inc: 10.3 TCR = 2060% of Civil engineering services BLS 0.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Moorman Kizer & Reitzel Inc safety composite

Moorman Kizer & Reitzel Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 15.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Moorman Kizer & Reitzel Inc: 3.9 → 15.1 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 16.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.47× in 2024

Moorman Kizer & Reitzel Inc's TCR rose 11.3 from 3.9 in 2016 to 15.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 16.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541330 · Fayetteville, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.3 · 2060% of ind

  • DART 15.1 DART
  • RANK #11/11
  • PHOTO Oro Grande
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Oro Grande (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Moorman Kizer & Reitzel Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Moorman Kizer & Reitzel Inc averages 10.3 TCR (2060% of the Civil engineering services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Moorman Kizer & Reitzel Inc TCR series: 2016=3.9 · 2017=12 · 2018=8.6 · 2019=5 · 2020=10.9 · 2021=5.1 · 2022=16 · 2023=15.9 · 2024=15.1 · BLS 0.5

Where Moorman Kizer & Reitzel Inc falls in its industry

690 Civil engineering services establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 11 Civil engineering services employers in North Carolina.

Moorman Kizer & Reitzel Inc (23 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 112 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Moorman Kizer & Reitzel Inc
Moorman Kizer & Reitzel Inc (23 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 112 employees and a TCR of 0.9

Moorman Kizer & Reitzel Inc has fewer employees than the Civil engineering services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 15.1 15.1 2 1 0
2023 15.9 15.9 1 2 0
2022 16.0 16.0 3 0 0
2021 5.1 0.0 1 0 0
2020 10.9 10.9 1 1 0
2019 5.0 5.0 0 1 0
2018 8.6 4.3 2 0 0
2017 12.0 12.0 3 0 0
2016 3.9 3.9 0 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541330 · NC · Fayetteville

690 Civil engineering services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 317 employers in Fayetteville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Oro Grande 10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT TENET PROVIDENCE EAST MC EVS 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT TENET DOCTORS MODESTO ES 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Down To Earth Compliance, LLC 9.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Farm 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE SOUTHERN PINES 1 SOW -EST 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cotton Gin 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Monroe Growout 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cape Fear Valley Health System/Cumberland County 5,925 FTE
CITY-NEAR Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company - Fayetteville 2,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Cumberland 2,104 FTE
CITY-NEAR Goodyear Fayetteville 2,044 FTE
NAT-TCR Angels Camp 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Balcones Recycling- Taylor 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Monroeville OH 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1443 10.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Blueline Construction 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Point Four, Inc 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dart Container Fiber 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Springhill Suites Arcadia/Pasadena 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.