Rendering plants · Pennsylvania

Mopac

Souderton, PA · ~186 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mopac runs at 96% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Rendering plants workplace, earning a grade C.

Mopac: 3.2 TCR = 96% of Rendering plants BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mopac safety composite

Mopac scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Mopac: 2.9 → 5.1 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 5.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.8× in 2023

Mopac's TCR rose 2.1 from 2.9 in 2021 to 5.1 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311613 · Souderton, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 96% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #3/7
  • PHOTO Darling Ingredients …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~186 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Darling Ingredients Baltimore Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Mopac in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mopac averages 3.2 TCR (96% of the Rendering plants BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mopac TCR series: 2021=2.9 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=5.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Mopac falls in its industry

151 Rendering plants establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 7 Rendering plants employers in Pennsylvania.

Mopac (186 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 46 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mopac
Mopac (186 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 46 employees and a TCR of 5.6

Mopac has more employees than the Rendering plants median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.1 2.5 11 1 0
2022 1.5 0.8 3 1 0
2021 2.9 1.3 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311613 · PA · Souderton

151 Rendering plants employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 69 employers in Souderton, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Darling Ingredients Baltimore Plant 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pilgrims Pride 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kingsburg Commodities 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR American Proteins, Inc. - Cumming Division 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lobar Associates, Inc. 186 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clover Farms Dairy Reading 186 FTE
STATE-SIZE IDL Worldwide 186 FTE
STATE-SIZE American Axles Manufactuing St. Marys 186 FTE
CITY-NEAR JBS Souderton INC 1,402 FTE
CITY-NEAR Almac Clinical Services LLC 764 FTE
CITY-NEAR Almac Clinical Technologies LLC 471 FTE
CITY-NEAR Leidy's Inc. 297 FTE
NAT-TCR The Joslyn Manufacturing Company, Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Gillett Office 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Jet Aviation Dulles, LLC 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Ryerson - Greenville 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Flender Corporation 186 FTE
NAT-SIZE Leonardo DRS-Huntsville, AL Facilities 186 FTE
NAT-SIZE Continental Office 186 FTE
NAT-SIZE Spuntech Industries 186 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.