Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Kentucky

Morning Pointe of Lexington

Lexington, KY · ~62 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Morning Pointe of Lexington runs at 323% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Morning Pointe of Lexington: 12.3 TCR = 323% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Morning Pointe of Lexington safety composite

Morning Pointe of Lexington scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−20.4

2016→2017

Morning Pointe of Lexington injury rate improved

Morning Pointe of Lexington's TCR fell 20.4 from 22.5 in 2016 to 2.0 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 22.5 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=22.5 · 2017=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Lexington, KY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.3 · 323% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #45/56
  • PHOTO Edgewood ParkWood Pl…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~62 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Edgewood ParkWood Place (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Morning Pointe of Lexington in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Morning Pointe of Lexington averages 12.3 TCR (323% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Morning Pointe of Lexington TCR series: 2016=22.5 · 2017=2 · BLS 3.8

Where Morning Pointe of Lexington falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #45 safest of 56 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Kentucky.

Morning Pointe of Lexington (62 employees, TCR 12.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Morning Pointe of Lexington
Morning Pointe of Lexington (62 employees, TCR 12.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Morning Pointe of Lexington has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2016 22.5 7.5 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · KY · Lexington

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 652 employers in Lexington, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Edgewood ParkWood Place 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Silverado San Juan Capistrano - 223 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR SALINA PRESBYTERIAN MANOR-SALINA 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Canterfield of Jacksonville, LLC 12.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pineville 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Terra Apartment Homes 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phillips Brothers Construction 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Berkel Piling Louisville 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Kentucky - Main Campus - Fayette County 11,013 FTE
CITY-NEAR UK Healthcare 9,922 FTE
CITY-NEAR YMCA of Central KY - Gatton Beaumont 3,933 FTE
CITY-NEAR YMCA of Central Ky - High Street 3,895 FTE
NAT-TCR 670-West Chester 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Silver Eagle Distributors, L.P. - Pasadena 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Hutchinson 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : STL6 12.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Marshall Dekalb Electric Copperative 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE East Valley Adult Resources 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE N and R of Tipton LLC 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE N and R of Silex Inc 62 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.