Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Georgia

Morningside of Gainesville

Gainesville, GA · ~26 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Morningside of Gainesville runs at 289% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Morningside of Gainesville: 11.0 TCR = 289% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Morningside of Gainesville safety composite

Morningside of Gainesville scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
F 27.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Morningside of Gainesville: 0.0 → 27.8 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 27.8 TCR · DART/TCR 2.53× in 2020

Morningside of Gainesville's TCR rose 27.8 from 0.0 in 2017 to 27.8 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 2.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Gainesville, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.0 · 289% of ind

  • DART 27.8 DART
  • RANK #142/205
  • PHOTO County Club of La Ch…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: County Club of La Cholla (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Morningside of Gainesville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Morningside of Gainesville averages 11.0 TCR (289% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Morningside of Gainesville TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=5.1 · 2020=27.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Morningside of Gainesville falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #142 safest of 205 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Georgia.

Morningside of Gainesville (26 employees, TCR 11.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Morningside of Gainesville
Morningside of Gainesville (26 employees, TCR 11.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Morningside of Gainesville has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 27.8 27.8 6 0 0
2018 5.1 5.1 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · GA · Gainesville

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 306 employers in Gainesville, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR County Club of La Cholla 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-63169 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR MBK - Dale Commons 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cadence at Mt. Zion 11.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE FPL Food Chatel Farms 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unlimited Contract Services - Pine Grove, LA 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pilgrim's Pride Athens Hatchery 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hawkins Logging & Timber Co LLC 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northeast Georgia Medical Center, Inc. 5,384 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kubota Manufacturing of America Corporation 1,863 FTE
CITY-NEAR Poultry Processing 1,546 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mar-Jac Poultry, Inc Processing Plant 1,190 FTE
NAT-TCR Amazon Transportation Services : DEN5 11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Amzl : Dps3 11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Spokane Branch 11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Hospital Couriers Florida (East) 11.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Atlas Peat & Soil, Inc. 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Majestic Marble 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE MTVSOLAR 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4769-176-West Elm 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.