Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Tennessee

Morningside of Gallatin

Gallatin, TN · ~29 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Morningside of Gallatin runs at 96% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Morningside of Gallatin: 3.7 TCR = 96% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Morningside of Gallatin safety composite

Morningside of Gallatin scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.7

2017→2020

Morningside of Gallatin injury rate improved

Morningside of Gallatin's TCR fell 9.7 from 9.8 in 2017 to 0.1 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.8 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.8 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Gallatin, TN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.7 · 96% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #19/100
  • PHOTO The Arbors at Adams …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Arbors at Adams Pointe (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Morningside of Gallatin in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Morningside of Gallatin averages 3.7 TCR (96% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Morningside of Gallatin TCR series: 2017=9.8 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=0.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Morningside of Gallatin falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 100 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Tennessee.

Morningside of Gallatin (29 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Morningside of Gallatin
Morningside of Gallatin (29 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Morningside of Gallatin has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.1 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.8 4.8 1 0 0
2017 9.8 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · TN · Gallatin

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 100 employers in Gallatin, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Arbors at Adams Pointe 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northgate Park Senior Living 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Palmettos of Parklane, LLC 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR New South Shore Manor 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tosh Pork Crutchfield 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Waynes Fayetteville 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brookfield Renewable - Brookfield Smoky Mountain Hydro 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE UCEMC Carthage 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sumner Regional Medical Center LLC 1,068 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gap Inc. - Central Omni 919 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gap Inc. - Gallatin Tennessee Omni 757 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tennessee Fulfillment Center 735 FTE
NAT-TCR Sendik's food Market Greenfield 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Baylor Orthopedic and Spine Hospital at Arlington 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Nidec Motor Corporation 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Iowa Home Care Ft. Dodge Office 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE New Philadelphia Office 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arbor - Troy Comm Cons Elementary Sd 30-C 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Courtyard Schaumburg 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arbor - Grayslake Cccsd 46 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.