Intellectual and developmental disability intermediate care facilities · Nebraska

Mosaic Norfolk

Norfolk, NE · ~100 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mosaic Norfolk runs at 122% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Intellectual and developmental disability intermediate care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Mosaic Norfolk: 4.6 TCR = 122% of Intellectual and developmental disability intermediate care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mosaic Norfolk safety composite

Mosaic Norfolk scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.5

2016→2024

Mosaic Norfolk injury rate improved

Mosaic Norfolk's TCR fell 3.5 from 8.1 in 2016 to 4.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.1 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=6.1 · 2020=4.4 · 2021=5.8 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=5.7 · 2024=4.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Norfolk, NE ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 122% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #9/21
  • PHOTO Alpha 2
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~100 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Alpha 2 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

Mosaic Norfolk in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mosaic Norfolk averages 4.6 TCR (122% of the Intellectual and developmental disability intermediate care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mosaic Norfolk TCR series: 2016=8.1 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=6.1 · 2020=4.4 · 2021=5.8 · 2022=0 · 2023=5.7 · 2024=4.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Mosaic Norfolk falls in its industry

2,261 Intellectual and developmental establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 21 Intellectual and developmental employers in Nebraska.

Mosaic Norfolk (100 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Mosaic Norfolk
Mosaic Norfolk (100 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Mosaic Norfolk has more employees than the Intellectual and developmental disabilit median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.5 1.5 3 0 0
2023 5.7 2.9 4 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 5.8 3.5 4 1 0
2020 4.4 3.3 4 0 0
2019 6.1 4.0 6 0 0
2018 2.3 2.3 2 0 0
2017 4.7 4.7 4 0 0
2016 8.1 6.0 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · NE · Norfolk

2,261 Intellectual and developmental disability intermediate care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 87 employers in Norfolk, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Alpha 2 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR B South Main St 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mosaic Waukon 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mosaic Pittsburg 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE HERITAGE HOMES OF NEBRASKA, INC 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kugler Oil Company Inc 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Reefer Systems INC dba Midlands Carrier Transicold 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amcon - Omaha 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Faith Regional Health Services West Campus 823 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nucor Steel Nebraska 506 FTE
CITY-NEAR AWG, Norfolk 493 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vulcraft Nebraska 460 FTE
NAT-TCR Kimball Management Corporation 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Onalaska 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Independence 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR North Dallas TX FXFE-NDA 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Blasch Precision Ceramics Albany 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE St Joseph's Home 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Napoleon, OH 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brandon Court Nursing Home DBA Rankin Community Care Center 100 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.