Plastics and rubber belts and hoses (without fittings) manufacturing · Texas

Mosites Rubber Company, Inc.

Fort Worth, TX · ~50 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mosites Rubber Company, Inc. runs at 93% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Plastics and rubber belts and hoses (without fittings) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Mosites Rubber Company, Inc.: 3.1 TCR = 93% of Plastics and rubber belts and hoses (without fittings) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mosites Rubber Company, Inc. safety composite

Mosites Rubber Company, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2017→2024

Mosites Rubber Company, Inc. injury rate improved

Mosites Rubber Company, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.3 from 3.3 in 2017 to 2.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.3 · 2021=4.0 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326220 · Fort Worth, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 93% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/8
  • PHOTO Fluid Connectors : K…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fluid Connectors : Kennett (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Mosites Rubber Company, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mosites Rubber Company, Inc. averages 3.1 TCR (93% of the Plastics and rubber belts and hoses (without fittings) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mosites Rubber Company, Inc. TCR series: 2017=3.3 · 2021=4 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=2 · BLS 3.3

Where Mosites Rubber Company, Inc. falls in its industry

160 Plastics and rubber belts and establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 8 Plastics and rubber belts and employers in Texas.

Mosites Rubber Company, Inc. (50 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 132 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Mosites Rubber Company, Inc.
Mosites Rubber Company, Inc. (50 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 132 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Mosites Rubber Company, Inc. has fewer employees than the Plastics and rubber belts and hoses (wit median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.0 0.0 1 0 0
2023 4.1 0.0 2 0 0
2022 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2021 4.0 2.0 2 0 0
2017 3.3 1.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326220 · TX · Fort Worth

160 Plastics and rubber belts and hoses (without fittings) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,346 employers in Fort Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fluid Connectors : Kennett 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gates Rubber Co Galesburg 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kuriyama of America, Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR HCI 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE 1836 Farms LLC 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schwertner Farms, Inc. 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Floydada Coop Gin #1 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gulf Coast Area Office 6400 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Fort Worth Lockheed Blvd (1093) 16,547 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Fort Worth Campus (1093) 13,805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Children's Medical Center 4,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX- Fort Worth 4,667 FTE
NAT-TCR Associate Engineering Corporation 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Elite Growers, Inc. 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Turlock Terminal 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Specialty Appliances, LLC 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Georgia PrintCo LLC 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Air Products and Chemicals Inc.- Middletown Facility 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mannington Price Cutter 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE CAI, Inc. 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.