Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · Minnesota

Mother of Mercy Senior Living

Albany, MN · ~160 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mother of Mercy Senior Living runs at 124% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade D.

Mother of Mercy Senior Living: 8.0 TCR = 124% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mother of Mercy Senior Living safety composite

Mother of Mercy Senior Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.1

2021→2023

Mother of Mercy Senior Living injury rate improved

Mother of Mercy Senior Living's TCR fell 4.1 from 10.1 in 2021 to 6.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 10.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=10.1 · 2022=8.1 · 2023=6.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Albany, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 8.0 · 124% of ind

  • DART 6.0 DART
  • RANK #213/430
  • PHOTO Hillcrest Millard, LLC
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~160 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hillcrest Millard, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Mother of Mercy Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mother of Mercy Senior Living averages 8.0 TCR (124% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mother of Mercy Senior Living TCR series: 2021=10.1 · 2022=8.1 · 2023=6 · BLS 6.5

Where Mother of Mercy Senior Living falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #213 safest of 430 Convalescent homes or convales employers in Minnesota.

Mother of Mercy Senior Living (160 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mother of Mercy Senior Living
Mother of Mercy Senior Living (160 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Mother of Mercy Senior Living has more employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 6.0 6.0 7 0 0
2022 8.1 8.1 9 0 0
2021 10.1 10.1 11 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · MN · Albany

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 15 employers in Albany, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hillcrest Millard, LLC 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southport Center for Nursing and Rehabil 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Solaris Healthcare Apopka 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 340 HERITAGE CENTER WV 8.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE PW-Transportation Operations 160 FTE
STATE-SIZE Entegris-Bloomington 160 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wilbert Plastic Services 160 FTE
STATE-SIZE Daikin Applied - Faribault North 160 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wells Concrete Products-Albany 181 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wells Concrete - Albany 175 FTE
CITY-NEAR Albany District Office 117 FTE
CITY-NEAR Albany Elementary 81 FTE
NAT-TCR U705 - Scalzo (120 Brookley) 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Oak Grove Center 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR NWR, Inc 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #4178 LAS CRUCES, NM 8.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Malcolm Drilling WA 160 FTE
NAT-SIZE UFP San Antonio LLC 160 FTE
NAT-SIZE Warehouse : COVINGTON RMC 160 FTE
NAT-SIZE 107 - Jacksonville 160 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.