Other Electronic Component Manufacturing · North Carolina

Motion Systems : Charlotte SSD

Charlotte, NC · ~121 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Motion Systems : Charlotte SSD runs at 20% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Other Electronic Component Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Motion Systems : Charlotte SSD: 0.7 TCR = 20% of Other Electronic Component Manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Motion Systems : Charlotte SSD safety composite

Motion Systems : Charlotte SSD scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2017→2020

Motion Systems : Charlotte SSD injury rate improved

Motion Systems : Charlotte SSD's TCR fell 2.6 from 2.6 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.6 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.6 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334419 · Charlotte, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 20% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/6
  • PHOTO SCHOTT Electronic Pa…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~121 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SCHOTT Electronic Packaging (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Motion Systems : Charlotte SSD in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Motion Systems : Charlotte SSD averages 0.7 TCR (20% of the Other Electronic Component Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Motion Systems : Charlotte SSD TCR series: 2017=2.6 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Motion Systems : Charlotte SSD falls in its industry

334 Other Electronic Component Man establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 6 Other Electronic Component Man employers in North Carolina.

Motion Systems : Charlotte SSD (121 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 108 employees and a TCR of 1.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Motion Systems : Charlotte SSD
Motion Systems : Charlotte SSD (121 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 108 employees and a TCR of 1.8

Motion Systems : Charlotte SSD has more employees than the Other Electronic Component Manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.6 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334419 · NC · Charlotte

334 Other Electronic Component Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SCHOTT Electronic Packaging 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR VIR 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Larson Davis 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wintec Industries, Inc. 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Providence Construction 121 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5523_12243 121 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2120 W Arlington Blvd 121 FTE
STATE-SIZE SE&M Constructors 121 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR 103558 - Kapalama Container Terminal - Yard 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Norstan Communications, Inc. - EP/MPLS* 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Pa - Acb (335) 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Wellford (BP) 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Palms of Pasadena Hospital 121 FTE
NAT-SIZE TraPac, LLC-Jacksonville 121 FTE
NAT-SIZE Riverside Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 121 FTE
NAT-SIZE FI - Carrollwood Care, LLC 121 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.