Motor vehicle interior systems (e.g., headliners, panels, seats, trims) manufacturing · Michigan

Motus Integrated Technologies

Battle Creek, MI · ~251 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Motus Integrated Technologies runs at 67% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Motor vehicle interior systems (e.g., headliners, panels, seats, trims) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Motus Integrated Technologies: 3.6 TCR = 67% of Motor vehicle interior systems (e.g., headliners, panels, seats, trims) manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Motus Integrated Technologies safety composite

Motus Integrated Technologies scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.5

2020→2024

Motus Integrated Technologies injury rate improved

Motus Integrated Technologies's TCR fell 3.5 from 5.9 in 2020 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.68× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=5.9 · 2021=3.1 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336360 · Battle Creek, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.6 · 67% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #59/100
  • PHOTO CS Manufacturing
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 36 inj
  • SIZE ~251 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CS Manufacturing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Motus Integrated Technologies in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Motus Integrated Technologies averages 3.6 TCR (67% of the Motor vehicle interior systems (e.g., headliners, panels, seats, trims) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Motus Integrated Technologies TCR series: 2020=5.9 · 2021=3.1 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 5.4

Where Motus Integrated Technologies falls in its industry

384 Motor vehicle interior systems establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #59 safest of 100 Motor vehicle interior systems employers in Michigan.

Motus Integrated Technologies (251 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 245 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Motus Integrated Technologies
Motus Integrated Technologies (251 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 245 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Motus Integrated Technologies has more employees than the Motor vehicle interior systems (e.g., he median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 2.4 4 0 0
2023 3.8 3.8 10 0 0
2022 2.7 1.6 7 0 0
2021 3.1 2.6 6 0 0
2020 5.9 3.3 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336360 · MI · Battle Creek

384 Motor vehicle interior systems (e.g., headliners, panels, seats, trims) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 161 employers in Battle Creek, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CS Manufacturing 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pieco, Incorporated 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Toyota Boshoku Mississippi, LLC 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Piolax Corporation 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Meijer Store 227 251 FTE
STATE-SIZE 185 - Auburn Hills 251 FTE
STATE-SIZE 213 - Birch Run Twp 251 FTE
STATE-SIZE 065 - Shelby Twp 251 FTE
CITY-NEAR Denso Manufacturing of Michigan 2,702 FTE
CITY-NEAR BRONSON BATTLE CREEK 1,530 FTE
CITY-NEAR Battle Creek HQ Corporate Office 1,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR I I Stanley Co., Inc. 729 FTE
NAT-TCR Mercy Hospital Tishomingo 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR BTI Ness City 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Perma-Fix of Florida 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Dayton Superior Corporation Tremont 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Foodservice Cincinnati - 0572 251 FTE
NAT-SIZE George Chiala Farms 251 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amcor Packaging Inc. Joplin 251 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 1450 251 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.