Individual and family social services, multi-purpose · New Hampshire

Mount Prospect Academy - Academic

Plymouth, NH · ~63 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
19.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mount Prospect Academy - Academic runs at 520% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Individual and family social services, multi-purpose workplace, earning a grade F.

Mount Prospect Academy - Academic: 19.8 TCR = 520% of Individual and family social services, multi-purpose BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mount Prospect Academy - Academic safety composite

Mount Prospect Academy - Academic scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 19.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 17.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2016→2022

Mount Prospect Academy - Academic injury rate improved

Mount Prospect Academy - Academic's TCR fell 1.2 from 19.2 in 2016 to 18.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 28.6 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.91× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=19.2 · 2017=16.8 · 2018=22.0 · 2019=28.6 · 2020=24.4 · 2021=9.3 · 2022=18.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624190 · Plymouth, NH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 19.8 · 520% of ind

  • DART 18.0 DART
  • RANK #37/40
  • PHOTO Saco Crisis
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 56 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Saco Crisis (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Hampshire employers → · Look up another →

Mount Prospect Academy - Academic in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mount Prospect Academy - Academic averages 19.8 TCR (520% of the Individual and family social services, multi-purpose BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mount Prospect Academy - Academic TCR series: 2016=19.2 · 2017=16.8 · 2018=22 · 2019=28.6 · 2020=24.4 · 2021=9.3 · 2022=18 · BLS 3.8

Where Mount Prospect Academy - Academic falls in its industry

990 Individual and family social s establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Hampshire alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #37 safest of 40 Individual and family social s employers in New Hampshire.

Mount Prospect Academy - Academic (63 employees, TCR 19.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Mount Prospect Academy - Academic
Mount Prospect Academy - Academic (63 employees, TCR 19.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Mount Prospect Academy - Academic has fewer employees than the Individual and family social services, m median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 18.0 18.0 2 0 0
2021 9.3 1.9 5 0 0
2020 24.4 13.9 14 0 0
2019 28.6 13.4 14 1 0
2018 22.0 4.0 8 3 0
2017 16.8 9.6 6 1 0
2016 19.2 10.9 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624190 · NH · Plymouth

990 Individual and family social services, multi-purpose employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,718 rated employers in New Hampshire with headcount on file · 23 employers in Plymouth, NH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Saco Crisis 19.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Child Saving Institute 20.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Becket House of Rumney 19.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3430 Spirit Way 18.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE RDS MACHINE, LLC 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fluke Electronics- Keene 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE MadgeTech, Inc. 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dover Honda - International Cars LTD 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Speare Memorial Hospital 390 FTE
CITY-NEAR Market Basket #86 266 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2758 204 FTE
CITY-NEAR SODEXO AT PLYMOUTH STATE UNIV. PROSPECT 194 FTE
NAT-TCR Olive Branch Acres, LLC. 19.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Kycrt - Louisville 19.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Arlington #135 19.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ashley Furniture Homestore- Plainfield DC 19.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE 3495-10D8005 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE L&L Ranches Idaho Nevada Utah 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE AWC Toledo 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG472 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.