Trucking, general freight, long-distance, truckload (TL) · North Carolina

Mountain River Trucking Co., Inc.

Mount Airy, NC · ~194 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mountain River Trucking Co., Inc. runs at 36% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Trucking, general freight, long-distance, truckload (TL) workplace, earning a grade A.

Mountain River Trucking Co., Inc.: 1.6 TCR = 36% of Trucking, general freight, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mountain River Trucking Co., Inc. safety composite

Mountain River Trucking Co., Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.3

2019→2020

Mountain River Trucking Co., Inc. injury rate improved

Mountain River Trucking Co., Inc.'s TCR fell 3.3 from 3.3 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.3 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=3.3 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Mount Airy, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 36% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #26/125
  • PHOTO Cleveland- Dry Bulk …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~194 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cleveland- Dry Bulk Transport (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Mountain River Trucking Co., Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mountain River Trucking Co., Inc. averages 1.6 TCR (36% of the Trucking, general freight, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Mountain River Trucking Co., Inc. TCR series: 2019=3.3 · 2020=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Mountain River Trucking Co., Inc. falls in its industry

3,252 Trucking, general freight, lon establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 125 Trucking, general freight, lon employers in North Carolina.

Mountain River Trucking Co., Inc. (194 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mountain River Trucking Co., Inc.
Mountain River Trucking Co., Inc. (194 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Mountain River Trucking Co., Inc. has more employees than the Trucking, general freight, long-distance median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.3 2.5 11 1 1

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · NC · Mount Airy

3,252 Trucking, general freight, long-distance, truckload (TL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 94 employers in Mount Airy, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cleveland- Dry Bulk Transport 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Super Transport International, Ltd 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amhof Trucking, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plant YS 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE CHARLOTTE CLT 194 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1127 194 FTE
STATE-SIZE City of Greensboro Engineering and Inspections 194 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plant # 2 194 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pike Florida Statewide Operations 1,583 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pike North Carolina Statewide Operations 1,161 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pike Georgia Statewide Operations 969 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pike Texas Statewide Operations 738 FTE
NAT-TCR Admiral Glass Company 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR WS Monroe 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Premium Building Products 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Asplundh Brush Control LLC 185 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sanders Wood Products 194 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baker Georgia 194 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pacific Star Seafoods 194 FTE
NAT-SIZE HCI Management Services 194 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.