Continuing care retirement communities · North Carolina

Mountain Vista Health Park

Denton, NC · ~133 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mountain Vista Health Park runs at 220% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade F.

Mountain Vista Health Park: 8.4 TCR = 220% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mountain Vista Health Park safety composite

Mountain Vista Health Park scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.7

2016→2023

Mountain Vista Health Park injury rate improved

Mountain Vista Health Park's TCR fell 6.7 from 8.6 in 2016 to 1.9 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 22.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.11× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.6 · 2017=7.0 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=2.9 · 2021=12.7 · 2022=22.3 · 2023=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Denton, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.4 · 220% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #81/105
  • PHOTO Covenant Living at I…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~133 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Covenant Living at Inverness (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Mountain Vista Health Park in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mountain Vista Health Park averages 8.4 TCR (220% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mountain Vista Health Park TCR series: 2016=8.6 · 2017=7 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=2.9 · 2021=12.7 · 2022=22.3 · 2023=1.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Mountain Vista Health Park falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #81 safest of 105 Continuing care retirement com employers in North Carolina.

Mountain Vista Health Park (133 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Mountain Vista Health Park
Mountain Vista Health Park (133 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Mountain Vista Health Park has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.9 0.9 2 0 0
2022 22.3 20.4 7 16 0
2021 12.7 11.4 4 6 0
2019 2.9 2.0 2 1 0
2018 3.1 2.1 3 0 0
2017 7.0 3.5 6 0 0
2016 8.6 4.3 6 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · NC · Denton

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 7 employers in Denton, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Covenant Living at Inverness 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR San Francisco Towers 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prairie Hills At Independence 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schoolyard Square 8.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE 7837-DUKE LEE 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hyper Networks, LLC 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kemco of Burlington, Inc 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE IOI Enterprises, Inc. 133 FTE
CITY-NEAR Construction Implements Depot 153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thermo Products, LLC 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lowes Foods #66 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Industrial Performance Group 34 FTE
NAT-TCR Stoneleigh Health Care Center Ltd. Co. d/b/a Larkspur 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Schomp Hyundai 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Fricke-Parks Press 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 55567 Las Vegas RACC 8.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Endicott #130 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE Massana Construction 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE DMG Paving & Grading Construction 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hiway Credit Union - Empire 133 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.