Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) · Minnesota
Mower County
Austin, MN · ~20 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- C
- Average Safety Record
- 0.0
- Avg TCR
- 3.2
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Mower County runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) workplace, earning a grade C.
Mower County: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) BLS 3.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)
Mower County safety composite
Mower County scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).
82/100
Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures
- Total Case Rate (TCR)
- A 0 per 100 workers
Safer than 100% of industry peers
- DART rate
- B 0 per 100 workers
Safer than 82% of industry peers
- Fatalities
- D 0
Safer than 52% of industry peers
Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).
Mower County held a steady TCR band
Mower County's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 0.0 TCR.
2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0
OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard
Establishment book 921110 · Austin, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL
Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind
- DART 0.0 DART
- RANK #0/139
- PHOTO Pima County Superior…
- BOOK 3y book
- INJ 0 inj
- SIZE ~20 FTE
Nearest TCR peer: Pima County Superior Court- APO South (0.0 TCR gap)
Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →
Mower County in the TCR neighbourhood
Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers
- This site 0
Mower County
0 TCR
- Pima County Su 0
Pima County Superior Court- APO South
0 TCR
- Civil Service 0
Civil Service
0 TCR
- Chatt - Develo 0
Chatt - Development Resource Center
0 TCR
- Chatt - Genera 0
Chatt - General Fund
0 TCR
What this shows Mower County averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) BLS benchmark).
Mower County TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.2
Where Mower County falls in its industry
1,010 Executive offices, federal, st establishmentsSafer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.
Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 139 Executive offices, federal, st employers in Minnesota.
Mower County has fewer employees than the Executive offices, federal, state, and l median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
OSHA ITA peer cross-reference
Establishment peer ledger
921110 · MN · Austin
1,010 Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 75 employers in Austin, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.
| Rel | Establishment | Metric |
|---|---|---|
| NAICS-TCR | Pima County Superior Court- APO South | 0.0 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | Civil Service | 0.0 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | Chatt - Development Resource Center | 0.0 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | Chatt - General Fund | 0.0 TCR |
| STATE-SIZE | C74 | 20 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | MNSGA-SEL-SELECT GENETICS ADMIN' | 20 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Bees Minnesota | 20 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Glyndon | 20 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Hormel Foods - Austin | 1,914 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Hormel Foods - Austin Plant | 1,884 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Hormel Foods Corporation | 1,581 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Quality Pork Processors Inc. | 1,208 FTE |
| NAT-TCR | Meijer 208 | 0.0 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Atlanta - Phipps | 0.0 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Binghamton | 0.0 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Detroit | 0.0 TCR |
| NAT-SIZE | PHX/Phoenix | 20 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Durand Agronomy | 20 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | 46 American Canyon | 20 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | 13 Atwater | 20 FTE |
Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.