Stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), metal, unfinished, manufacturing · Texas

M&P Flange and Pipe Protection

Houston, TX · ~25 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

M&P Flange and Pipe Protection runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), metal, unfinished, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

M&P Flange and Pipe Protection: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), metal, unfinished, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

M&P Flange and Pipe Protection safety composite

M&P Flange and Pipe Protection scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

M&P Flange and Pipe Protection held a steady TCR band

M&P Flange and Pipe Protection's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332119 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/22
  • PHOTO Johnson & Hoffman, LLC
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Johnson & Hoffman, LLC (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

M&P Flange and Pipe Protection in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows M&P Flange and Pipe Protection averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), metal, unfinished, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

M&P Flange and Pipe Protection TCR series: 2016=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where M&P Flange and Pipe Protection falls in its industry

477 Stampings (except automotive, establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 22 Stampings (except automotive, employers in Texas.

M&P Flange and Pipe Protection (25 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate M&P Flange and Pipe Protection
M&P Flange and Pipe Protection (25 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1

M&P Flange and Pipe Protection has fewer employees than the Stampings (except automotive, cans, coin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332119 · TX · Houston

477 Stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), metal, unfinished, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Johnson & Hoffman, LLC 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 130 Belmont Drive 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR MICRO B130 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR WLS Fabricating 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Village Farms of Monahans 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lubbock Feeders, LLC 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Circle Three Feed Yard, Ltd 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE SEABOARD FOODS LP 501-508 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 128 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Integration Appliance Inc. 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Raleigh Managed Services 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Keller Warehouse 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Edlen Electrical Exhibition Services Miami 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gainesville Hotel Investment G - N86 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holiday Inn Express Inverness 9-2 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Comfort Suites Dunnellon - 9-1 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.