Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) · New Jersey

MS - Lakehurst, NJ - 5LANJ

Lakehurst, NJ · ~47 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MS - Lakehurst, NJ - 5LANJ runs at 17% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) workplace, earning a grade A.

MS - Lakehurst, NJ - 5LANJ: 0.8 TCR = 17% of Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MS - Lakehurst, NJ - 5LANJ safety composite

MS - Lakehurst, NJ - 5LANJ scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

MS - Lakehurst, NJ - 5LANJ held a steady TCR band

MS - Lakehurst, NJ - 5LANJ's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.3 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Lakehurst, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 17% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/21
  • PHOTO Turbine Standard - H…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Turbine Standard - Headquarters (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

MS - Lakehurst, NJ - 5LANJ in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MS - Lakehurst, NJ - 5LANJ averages 0.8 TCR (17% of the Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

MS - Lakehurst, NJ - 5LANJ TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=0 · BLS 4.5

Where MS - Lakehurst, NJ - 5LANJ falls in its industry

992 Aircraft maintenance and repai establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 21 Aircraft maintenance and repai employers in New Jersey.

MS - Lakehurst, NJ - 5LANJ (47 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate MS - Lakehurst, NJ - 5LANJ
MS - Lakehurst, NJ - 5LANJ (47 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

MS - Lakehurst, NJ - 5LANJ has fewer employees than the Aircraft maintenance and repair services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · NJ · Lakehurst

992 Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 6 employers in Lakehurst, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Turbine Standard - Headquarters 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR NC011 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR d/b/a Meggitt Services & Support 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR MS - Norfolk, VA - 5NFV2 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cape May Division 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mount Holly Municipal Utilities Authority 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE HC Constructors Inc. 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.A. Nolt, Inc. 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR 334125-LAKEHURST PO 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR LAKEHURST_1369667 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR SP - CRESTWOOD MANOR 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR WAWA SITE - 8494 49 FTE
NAT-TCR Corporate Schofield 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 206 Caterpillar DBSU East Peoria IL 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Arellano Construction Company 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR JFSNA at ADM Columbus 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Custom Building Products LASC 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oldcastle OPI - Fredericksburg 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE CG015 - Freetown, MA 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Port Angeles (Wapor) 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.