Ultrasonic welding equipment manufacturing · Michigan

MS Ultrasonic Technology, LLC- Howell, MI

Howell, MI · ~47 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MS Ultrasonic Technology, LLC- Howell, MI runs at 22% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Ultrasonic welding equipment manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

MS Ultrasonic Technology, LLC- Howell, MI: 0.7 TCR = 22% of Ultrasonic welding equipment manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MS Ultrasonic Technology, LLC- Howell, MI safety composite

MS Ultrasonic Technology, LLC- Howell, MI scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

MS Ultrasonic Technology, LLC- Howell, MI: 0.0 → 2.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 2.2 TCR · DART/TCR 3× in 2024

MS Ultrasonic Technology, LLC- Howell, MI's TCR rose 2.2 from 0.0 in 2022 to 2.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333992 · Howell, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 22% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #2/16
  • PHOTO Lincoln Electric Aut…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lincoln Electric Automation Fort Loramie (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

MS Ultrasonic Technology, LLC- Howell, MI in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MS Ultrasonic Technology, LLC- Howell, MI averages 0.7 TCR (22% of the Ultrasonic welding equipment manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

MS Ultrasonic Technology, LLC- Howell, MI TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.2 · BLS 3.3

Where MS Ultrasonic Technology, LLC- Howell, MI falls in its industry

129 Ultrasonic welding equipment m establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 16 Ultrasonic welding equipment m employers in Michigan.

MS Ultrasonic Technology, LLC- Howell, MI (47 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate MS Ultrasonic Technology, LLC- Howell, MI
MS Ultrasonic Technology, LLC- Howell, MI (47 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 2.8

MS Ultrasonic Technology, LLC- Howell, MI has fewer employees than the Ultrasonic welding equipment manufacturi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333992 · MI · Howell

129 Ultrasonic welding equipment manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 94 employers in Howell, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lincoln Electric Automation Fort Loramie 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Branson Ultrasonics Corporation Brookfield 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wolf Robotics, LLC 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Paslin, Ryan 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nash Greenhouses, LLC 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Red Arrow Dairy 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE SEMCO Energy Gas Company - BC 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Operations and Maintenance 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thai Summit America 797 FTE
CITY-NEAR Livingston County 721 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Joseph Mercy Livingston Hospital 708 FTE
CITY-NEAR Trinity Health St. Joseph Mercy Livingston 488 FTE
NAT-TCR White Glove Holdings of Vero LLC 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Virginia Everywhere LLC (dba All Points Broadband) 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR LandSouth Construction, LLC 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Coahoma Electric Power Association - Coahoma 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Domestic Fabrics & Blankets, Corp. 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Green Bay Packaging Inc 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stampings of Minnesota, Inc. 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE National Fire & Life Safety 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.