Custom architectural millwork and fixtures, manufacturing on a job shop basis · Missouri

MSW Inc.

Joplin, MO · ~85 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MSW Inc. runs at 120% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Custom architectural millwork and fixtures, manufacturing on a job shop basis workplace, earning a grade C.

MSW Inc.: 4.0 TCR = 120% of Custom architectural millwork and fixtures, manufacturing on a job shop basis BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MSW Inc. safety composite

MSW Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2024

MSW Inc. injury rate improved

MSW Inc.'s TCR fell 0.4 from 5.0 in 2016 to 4.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.38× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.0 · 2017=3.6 · 2018=3.7 · 2019=5.5 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=5.4 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=4.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 337212 · Joplin, MO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.0 · 120% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #5/10
  • PHOTO Crown Custom Millwor…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~85 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Crown Custom Millwork, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

MSW Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MSW Inc. averages 4.0 TCR (120% of the Custom architectural millwork and fixtures, manufacturing on a job shop basis BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

MSW Inc. TCR series: 2016=5 · 2017=3.6 · 2018=3.7 · 2019=5.5 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=5.4 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=4.6 · BLS 3.3

Where MSW Inc. falls in its industry

371 Custom architectural millwork establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 10 Custom architectural millwork employers in Missouri.

MSW Inc. (85 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate MSW Inc.
MSW Inc. (85 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.9

MSW Inc. has more employees than the Custom architectural millwork and fixtur median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.6 1.5 3 0 0
2023 3.1 0.0 2 0 0
2022 5.4 1.8 3 0 0
2021 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2020 3.5 1.1 3 0 0
2019 5.5 2.4 6 1 0
2018 3.7 3.7 3 1 0
2017 3.6 3.6 4 0 0
2016 5.0 5.0 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

337212 · MO · Joplin

371 Custom architectural millwork and fixtures, manufacturing on a job shop basis employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 203 employers in Joplin, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Crown Custom Millwork, LLC 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Missoula MT Millwork 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pacific Cabinets Inc. - Main Office 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR MG MILLWORK 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lippert Mechanical Service Corp 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE DOUBLE CHECK Kansas City D&H United Fueling Solutions 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE BrandSafway Industries, LLC - St. Louis Branch 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE The DeWitt Company, Inc 85 FTE
CITY-NEAR Freeman Health System 3,718 FTE
CITY-NEAR MERCY HOSPITAL JOPLIN 1,561 FTE
CITY-NEAR Marmic Fire & Safety Company Inc. 875 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jasper Products, LLC 782 FTE
NAT-TCR Minnie Hamilton Health System 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cumberland 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Williams Tool, Inc. 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Shands UF Hospital 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE QSI Dayton 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Home Care Services 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Honda East 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Helms Bros Inc 85 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.