Die Manufacturing · Michigan

Mt. Elliott Tool & Die Manufacturing Facility

Detroit, MI · ~111 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mt. Elliott Tool & Die Manufacturing Facility runs at 23% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Die Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Mt. Elliott Tool & Die Manufacturing Facility: 0.8 TCR = 23% of Die Manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mt. Elliott Tool & Die Manufacturing Facility safety composite

Mt. Elliott Tool & Die Manufacturing Facility scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2016→2019

Mt. Elliott Tool & Die Manufacturing Facility injury rate improved

Mt. Elliott Tool & Die Manufacturing Facility's TCR fell 1.0 from 1.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.0 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.0 · 2017=2.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333514 · Detroit, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 23% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/131
  • PHOTO Peterson's Welding a…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~111 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Peterson's Welding and Machine (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Mt. Elliott Tool & Die Manufacturing Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mt. Elliott Tool & Die Manufacturing Facility averages 0.8 TCR (23% of the Die Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mt. Elliott Tool & Die Manufacturing Facility TCR series: 2016=1 · 2017=2 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Mt. Elliott Tool & Die Manufacturing Facility falls in its industry

387 Die Manufacturing establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 131 Die Manufacturing employers in Michigan.

Mt. Elliott Tool & Die Manufacturing Facility (111 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Mt. Elliott Tool & Die Manufacturing Facility
Mt. Elliott Tool & Die Manufacturing Facility (111 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Mt. Elliott Tool & Die Manufacturing Facility has more employees than the Die Manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.0 1.0 4 0 0
2016 1.0 0.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333514 · MI · Detroit

387 Die Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 673 employers in Detroit, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Peterson's Welding and Machine 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jacksonville, Florida Container Graphics Corporation 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR DMT Workholding 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mercury Machine Company 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2552-Constantine, MI 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE KEPS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. d/b/a ACD.net 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE Utility Contracting Company 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE CEI Michigan, LLC 111 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henry Ford Hospital 8,838 FTE
CITY-NEAR Detroit Campus 8,632 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - DTW 6,640 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Motors Corporation 5,241 FTE
NAT-TCR Cabot Microelectronics Corporation - 845 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Southwire Mineral Wells Plant 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Cav Core Office 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Plant 84 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Michels Foundations- New Berlin 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE Babcock 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE Walt Oxley enterprises, Inc. dba Ciarra Construction 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE TransPak- Austin 111 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.