Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · North Carolina

Mt Pleasant House

Name: Mt Pleasant House Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Mt Pleasant, NC · ~38 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

C
Average Safety Record: 4.2
Avg TCR: 3.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mt Pleasant House runs at 109% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Mt Pleasant House: 4.2 TCR = 109% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mt Pleasant House safety composite

Mt Pleasant House scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): B 4.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.5

2016→2021

Mt Pleasant House injury rate improved

Mt Pleasant House's TCR fell 6.5 from 6.5 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 15.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.5 · 2017=15.1 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Mt Pleasant, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.2 · 109% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #107/356
PHOTO Waterstone at Welles…
BOOK 6y book
INJ 6 inj
SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Waterstone at Wellesley (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

This site

4.2
Waterstone at

4.2
The Drake

4.2
LH- 51 Schoone

4.2
Ashley Park

4.2

What this shows Mt Pleasant House averages 4.2 TCR (109% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Mt Pleasant House TCR series: 2016=6.5 · 2017=15.1 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Mt Pleasant House falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

Grade C

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #107 safest of 356 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

Mt Pleasant House (38 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Mt Pleasant House has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses
2021	0.0	0.0	0	0
2020	0.0	0.0	0	0
2019	0.0	0.0	0	0
2018	3.2	0.0	1	0
2017	15.1	15.1	3	1
2016	6.5	6.5	2	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NC · Mt Pleasant

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Waterstone at Wellesley	WELLESLEY, MA	4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	The Drake	CONCORD, NC	4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	LH- 51 Schooner	DAMARISCOTTA, ME	4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Ashley Park	CHARLESTON, SC	4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Morganton Hatchery	MORGANTON	38 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Harris Energy & Environmental Center	NEW HILL	38 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Enerdyne Power Systems, Inc	CHARLOTTE	38 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Electric Utilities (8100)	STATESVILLE	38 FTE
NAT-TCR	Ruan Transport Corporation T-039	Rialto, CA	4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	Ruan Transport Corporation T-128	Madison, WI	4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	JX Truck Center Bloomington	Bloomington, IL	4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	Arden	Carmichael, CA	4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE	HDS-Jackson	Jackson, GA	38 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Andersons Upper Sandusky Plant Nutrient	Upper Sandusky, OH	38 FTE
NAT-SIZE	The Gardens of Social Circle	Social Circle, GA	38 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Air To Ground Services, Inc.-LA	Los Angeles, CA	38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.