Custodial services · Alabama

Mt. Royal Towers (Housekeeping)

Birmingham, AL · ~26 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mt. Royal Towers (Housekeeping) runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Custodial services workplace, earning a grade C.

Mt. Royal Towers (Housekeeping): 0.0 TCR = 0% of Custodial services BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mt. Royal Towers (Housekeeping) safety composite

Mt. Royal Towers (Housekeeping) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Mt. Royal Towers (Housekeeping) held a steady TCR band

Mt. Royal Towers (Housekeeping)'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 0.0 TCR.

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Birmingham, AL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/70
  • PHOTO DEL0000222 Dover Jan…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DEL0000222 Dover Janitorial (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Mt. Royal Towers (Housekeeping) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mt. Royal Towers (Housekeeping) averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Custodial services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Mt. Royal Towers (Housekeeping) TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Mt. Royal Towers (Housekeeping) falls in its industry

4,064 Custodial services establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 70 Custodial services employers in Alabama.

Mt. Royal Towers (Housekeeping) (26 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Mt. Royal Towers (Housekeeping)
Mt. Royal Towers (Housekeeping) (26 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Mt. Royal Towers (Housekeeping) has fewer employees than the Custodial services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · AL · Birmingham

4,064 Custodial services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 840 employers in Birmingham, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DEL0000222 Dover Janitorial 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corporate 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR MANGUAL OFFICE CLEANING 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR DEL0000302 NCC JANITORIAL 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dallas 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE 343 Mobile 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Decatur (Plugs) - PRW 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4186-01758 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR USD 9,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR CLASSIC FOODS 9,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR BIRMINGHAM PACKERS 8,650 FTE
NAT-TCR GeoCare, Inc. DBA Home Instead Senior Care 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR TX-01 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR NJ-05 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CT-02 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 156 Arbor Town Square 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arrow Exterminators Vero Beach 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE North Platte - 90-02 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Myers Construction 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.