Ambulance services, air or ground · California

Mt. Shasta Ambulance Service, Inc.

Mount Shasta, CA · ~34 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mt. Shasta Ambulance Service, Inc. runs at 348% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Ambulance services, air or ground workplace, earning a grade F.

Mt. Shasta Ambulance Service, Inc.: 13.2 TCR = 348% of Ambulance services, air or ground BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mt. Shasta Ambulance Service, Inc. safety composite

Mt. Shasta Ambulance Service, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2017→2023

Mt. Shasta Ambulance Service, Inc. injury rate improved

Mt. Shasta Ambulance Service, Inc.'s TCR fell 3.4 from 8.3 in 2017 to 5.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 27.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=8.3 · 2018=23.0 · 2019=16.2 · 2020=27.8 · 2021=9.9 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=5.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621910 · Mount Shasta, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.2 · 348% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #69/87
  • PHOTO Volunteer Medical Se…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Volunteer Medical Service Corp (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Mt. Shasta Ambulance Service, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mt. Shasta Ambulance Service, Inc. averages 13.2 TCR (348% of the Ambulance services, air or ground BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mt. Shasta Ambulance Service, Inc. TCR series: 2017=8.3 · 2018=23 · 2019=16.2 · 2020=27.8 · 2021=9.9 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=5 · BLS 3.8

Where Mt. Shasta Ambulance Service, Inc. falls in its industry

976 Ambulance services, air or gro establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #69 safest of 87 Ambulance services, air or gro employers in California.

Mt. Shasta Ambulance Service, Inc. (34 employees, TCR 13.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 8.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Mt. Shasta Ambulance Service, Inc.
Mt. Shasta Ambulance Service, Inc. (34 employees, TCR 13.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 8.3

Mt. Shasta Ambulance Service, Inc. has fewer employees than the Ambulance services, air or ground median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.0 2.5 2 0 0
2022 2.5 0.0 1 0 0
2021 9.9 2.5 4 0 0
2020 27.8 12.6 1 10 0
2019 16.2 4.6 5 2 0
2018 23.0 2.5 5 4 0
2017 8.3 5.6 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621910 · CA · Mount Shasta

976 Ambulance services, air or ground employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Volunteer Medical Service Corp 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Placer County Operations 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eastern Area Prehospital Services 13.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Central EMS 13.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ardent Mills Yuba City 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Filice Farms, L.P. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alexander Ranch, Inc. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE MFarms 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Berryvale, inc. 56 FTE
NAT-TCR Marshall Public School 13.2 TCR
NAT-TCR William Penn Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center 13.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Cascades at Orchard Park 13.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Vallia Foods LLC 13.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Parks Department (Location) 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mi-Tech Services, Inc. - Fond du Lac 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chameleon Color Cards, Ltd. 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE T/J Fabricators, Inc. 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.