Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) · Arizona

MTC Kingman

Golden Valley, AZ · ~22 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MTC Kingman runs at 187% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) workplace, earning a grade D.

MTC Kingman: 5.6 TCR = 187% of Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) BLS 3.0 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MTC Kingman safety composite

MTC Kingman scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

MTC Kingman: 3.5 → 5.6 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 14.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2023

MTC Kingman's TCR rose 2.0 from 3.5 in 2016 to 5.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 14.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Golden Valley, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.6 · 187% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #105/152
  • PHOTO Whittier Campus In
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Whittier Campus In (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

MTC Kingman in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MTC Kingman averages 5.6 TCR (187% of the Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

MTC Kingman TCR series: 2016=3.5 · 2017=4.6 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=14.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=11.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=5.6 · BLS 3.0

Where MTC Kingman falls in its industry

6,952 Cafeteria food services contra establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #105 safest of 152 Cafeteria food services contra employers in Arizona.

MTC Kingman (22 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate MTC Kingman
MTC Kingman (22 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

MTC Kingman has fewer employees than the Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.6 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 11.9 0.0 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 14.4 4.8 3 0 0
2018 4.8 0.0 1 0 0
2017 4.6 0.0 1 0 0
2016 3.5 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · AZ · Golden Valley

6,952 Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 8 employers in Golden Valley, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Whittier Campus In 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR UNR PACK PLACE 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4021-400217800 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR NU Allison 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lehi Farm 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trulieve - El Mirage 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stanfield Farm 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kammann & Son Farms LLC 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4238-267 331 FTE
CITY-NEAR Central Trucking, Inc AZ 108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Interstate Warehousing - Kingman 68 FTE
CITY-NEAR ConRoc Ready Mix, LLC 26 FTE
NAT-TCR Mercer County Electric Inc 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Grocery Outlet 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Salem Grocery Outlet 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Partners In Home Care, Inc 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Country View Senior Living 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Morrison Sign Company, Inc. 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Royal Truck & Equipment 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE L. P. Brown Company, Inc. Wire Operation 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.