Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, frozen) manufacturing · Arkansas

Muldrow Distribution

Fort Smith, AR · ~64 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Muldrow Distribution runs at 154% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, frozen) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Muldrow Distribution: 5.1 TCR = 154% of Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, frozen) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Muldrow Distribution safety composite

Muldrow Distribution scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2021→2023

Muldrow Distribution injury rate improved

Muldrow Distribution's TCR fell 1.9 from 5.4 in 2021 to 3.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 6.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.68× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=5.4 · 2022=6.3 · 2023=3.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311615 · Fort Smith, AR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.1 · 154% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #46/69
  • PHOTO Ambassador Sanitatio…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ambassador Sanitation Management @ Pilgrim's Pride Elberton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Muldrow Distribution in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Muldrow Distribution averages 5.1 TCR (154% of the Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, frozen) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Muldrow Distribution TCR series: 2021=5.4 · 2022=6.3 · 2023=3.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Muldrow Distribution falls in its industry

509 Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #46 safest of 69 Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, employers in Arkansas.

Muldrow Distribution (64 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Muldrow Distribution
Muldrow Distribution (64 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Muldrow Distribution has fewer employees than the Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, fr median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.5 3.5 2 0 0
2022 6.3 6.3 4 0 0
2021 5.4 5.4 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311615 · AR · Fort Smith

509 Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, frozen) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 249 employers in Fort Smith, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ambassador Sanitation Management @ Pilgrim's Pride Elberton 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Primary Poultry - California MO Plant 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR OKF Heavener Live Haul 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1243 - Plant - Live Oak, FL 5.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE LR-Port 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE BHGAR - Lowell (AR016) 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jonesboro Roofing Co., Inc. 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fureigh Electric 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR MERCY HOSPITAL FORT SMITH 1,944 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABB Motors and Mechanical, Inc. - Fort Smith 1,298 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fort Smith - 5713 RS Boreham Jr Street 985 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Health Medical Center - Fort Smith 970 FTE
NAT-TCR Residence Inn Phoenix Airport 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR MCK Huntsville 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR POET Biorefining - Ashton 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Lawrence County Nursing Center 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nordic Industries, Inc. 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carol Stream Fire Protection District 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dragon Fab Tech Casper 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Erie Mechanical Contractors, Inc 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.