Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) · North Carolina

Multi-Color Corporation - Asheville

Weaverville, NC · ~66 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Multi-Color Corporation - Asheville runs at 10% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) workplace, earning a grade A.

Multi-Color Corporation - Asheville: 0.3 TCR = 10% of Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Multi-Color Corporation - Asheville safety composite

Multi-Color Corporation - Asheville scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Multi-Color Corporation - Asheville: 0.0 → 1.6 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 1.6 TCR · DART/TCR 4.94× in 2021

Multi-Color Corporation - Asheville's TCR rose 1.6 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.6 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 4.94× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Weaverville, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 10% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #2/92
  • PHOTO Fresno Sinclair Syst…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fresno Sinclair Systems INTL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Multi-Color Corporation - Asheville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Multi-Color Corporation - Asheville averages 0.3 TCR (10% of the Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Multi-Color Corporation - Asheville TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2021=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Multi-Color Corporation - Asheville falls in its industry

2,001 Offset printing (except books, establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 92 Offset printing (except books, employers in North Carolina.

Multi-Color Corporation - Asheville (66 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Multi-Color Corporation - Asheville
Multi-Color Corporation - Asheville (66 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Multi-Color Corporation - Asheville has fewer employees than the Offset printing (except books, printing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · NC · Weaverville

2,001 Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 21 employers in Weaverville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fresno Sinclair Systems INTL 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Velo3D 452 McGlincy Lane 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Mines Press, Inc 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Haig Press, Inc. 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Clinton Field Services 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Riverbend Steam Station 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Salisbury Operations Center 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE ASHEVILLE OPERATIONS 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR Epsilon, Inc. 331 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4334 306 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4334 296 FTE
CITY-NEAR Store 180 198 FTE
NAT-TCR SUEZ WTS USA, Inc. 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Grasslands Campus 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, LLC. Barceloneta 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR APL Logistics WMS, Inc. 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fitchburg Paperboard 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE National Powerline 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Fresh Market 129 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Fresh Markets 174 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.