Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability · Minnesota

Multi Community Care and Homes Inc

Litchfield, MN · ~70 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Multi Community Care and Homes Inc runs at 356% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability workplace, earning a grade F.

Multi Community Care and Homes Inc: 13.5 TCR = 356% of Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Multi Community Care and Homes Inc safety composite

Multi Community Care and Homes Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 14.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2019→2022

Multi Community Care and Homes Inc injury rate improved

Multi Community Care and Homes Inc's TCR fell 2.4 from 16.9 in 2019 to 14.5 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 16.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.07× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=16.9 · 2021=9.1 · 2022=14.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Litchfield, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.5 · 356% of ind

  • DART 14.5 DART
  • RANK #102/112
  • PHOTO VO WV CLINICAL WAIVE…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~70 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: VO WV CLINICAL WAIVER - PRINCETON AREA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Multi Community Care and Homes Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Multi Community Care and Homes Inc averages 13.5 TCR (356% of the Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Multi Community Care and Homes Inc TCR series: 2019=16.9 · 2021=9.1 · 2022=14.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Multi Community Care and Homes Inc falls in its industry

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #102 safest of 112 Group homes, intellectual and employers in Minnesota.

Multi Community Care and Homes Inc (70 employees, TCR 13.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Multi Community Care and Homes Inc
Multi Community Care and Homes Inc (70 employees, TCR 13.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Multi Community Care and Homes Inc has more employees than the Group homes, intellectual and developmen median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 14.5 14.5 5 2 0
2021 9.1 5.5 2 3 0
2019 16.9 10.6 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · MN · Litchfield

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 48 employers in Litchfield, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR VO WV CLINICAL WAIVER - PRINCETON AREA 13.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR TEHA DAY PROGRAM 13.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Community Supports Network, Inc. - Council Bluffs 13.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ruffsdale 13.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Harmony 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE St. Cloud Service Center 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE H2I Group 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northern Valley Machine 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR Litchfield ISD #465 358 FTE
CITY-NEAR Litchfield, MN 332 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bobcat Doosan Litchfield 293 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4374 214 FTE
NAT-TCR Parkway Health Care Center 13.5 TCR
NAT-TCR EX Care - Lex 13.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 4054-ABS-0005-0004-00065 13.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0029-0029-02338 13.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Leonard Craft Co. LLC 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE BakeFresh Colorado 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE ISE-Mag Tech 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Diversicare of Chanute 70 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.