Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability · Minnesota

Multi-Community Care and Homes Inc

Litchfield, MN · ~60 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Multi-Community Care and Homes Inc runs at 317% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability workplace, earning a grade F.

Multi-Community Care and Homes Inc: 12.0 TCR = 317% of Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Multi-Community Care and Homes Inc safety composite

Multi-Community Care and Homes Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2023→2024

Multi-Community Care and Homes Inc injury rate improved

Multi-Community Care and Homes Inc's TCR fell 1.7 from 12.9 in 2023 to 11.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 12.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.23× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=12.9 · 2024=11.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Litchfield, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.0 · 317% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #98/112
  • PHOTO St. Petersburg Homes
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: St. Petersburg Homes (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Multi-Community Care and Homes Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Multi-Community Care and Homes Inc averages 12.0 TCR (317% of the Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Multi-Community Care and Homes Inc TCR series: 2023=12.9 · 2024=11.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Multi-Community Care and Homes Inc falls in its industry

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #98 safest of 112 Group homes, intellectual and employers in Minnesota.

Multi-Community Care and Homes Inc (60 employees, TCR 12.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Multi-Community Care and Homes Inc
Multi-Community Care and Homes Inc (60 employees, TCR 12.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Multi-Community Care and Homes Inc has fewer employees than the Group homes, intellectual and developmen median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.2 2.8 4 0 0
2023 12.9 2.6 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · MN · Litchfield

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 48 employers in Litchfield, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR St. Petersburg Homes 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Therapeutic Living Centers 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bittersweet, Inc. 12.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR RCRP ANDERSON WOODS 12.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Living Greens Farm 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Sweden Dairy 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Customer Service Support 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Twin Cities Specialties 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR Litchfield ISD #465 358 FTE
CITY-NEAR Litchfield, MN 332 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bobcat Doosan Litchfield 293 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4374 214 FTE
NAT-TCR Idaho Pacific - Firth 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Wyjak - Jackson Center 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR LA Express LLC 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Saint Elizabeth Home 12.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wcis LLC 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE KEI Electrical Construction and Maintenance, Inc. 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tiffany Heights 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marquette Board of Light & Power 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.