Bumpers and bumperettes assembled, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing · Indiana

Multimatic Butler Indiana

Butler, IN · ~338 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
10.0
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Multimatic Butler Indiana runs at 185% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Bumpers and bumperettes assembled, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Multimatic Butler Indiana: 10.0 TCR = 185% of Bumpers and bumperettes assembled, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Multimatic Butler Indiana safety composite

Multimatic Butler Indiana scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.3

2017→2018

Multimatic Butler Indiana injury rate improved

Multimatic Butler Indiana's TCR fell 3.3 from 11.7 in 2017 to 8.4 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 11.7 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=11.7 · 2018=8.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336390 · Butler, IN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 10.0 · 185% of ind

  • DART 4.3 DART
  • RANK #62/66
  • PHOTO Jost International C…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 67 inj
  • SIZE ~338 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jost International Corporation (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Multimatic Butler Indiana in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Multimatic Butler Indiana averages 10.0 TCR (185% of the Bumpers and bumperettes assembled, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Multimatic Butler Indiana TCR series: 2017=11.7 · 2018=8.4 · BLS 5.4

Where Multimatic Butler Indiana falls in its industry

772 Bumpers and bumperettes assemb establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #62 safest of 66 Bumpers and bumperettes assemb employers in Indiana.

Multimatic Butler Indiana (338 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Multimatic Butler Indiana
Multimatic Butler Indiana (338 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Multimatic Butler Indiana has more employees than the Bumpers and bumperettes assembled, autom median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 8.4 4.3 33 0 0
2017 11.7 6.2 34 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336390 · IN · Butler

772 Bumpers and bumperettes assembled, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 26 employers in Butler, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Jost International Corporation 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lincoln Industries - Fabrication 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Yinlun TDI LLC 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR CURT Group - Brandon 10.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE GLOBAL PLASTICS 338 FTE
STATE-SIZE Multimatic Indiana 338 FTE
STATE-SIZE US Foods Indianapolis 338 FTE
STATE-SIZE Locating Holdings LH001 (HQ) 9900 338 FTE
CITY-NEAR Therma Tru 947 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Flat Roll Group - Butler 918 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steel Dynamics Flat Roll Group - Butler 780 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Millennium Building Systems, LLC. - Butler 278 FTE
NAT-TCR Honda East Liberty Plant (Marysville) 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sysco of Portland 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 4795-PD-MGM-MONTGOMERY-PD 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 531 ABC Supply Co., inc. 10.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE A NLV Cab LLC 338 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marion Folding 338 FTE
NAT-SIZE ESLGCAHZ 338 FTE
NAT-SIZE FedEx Supply Chain - Capital Returns Milwaukee 338 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.