Carbon, activated, manufacturing · New York

Multisorb Technologies Equipment Systems Group

Cheektowaga, NY · ~21 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Multisorb Technologies Equipment Systems Group runs at 64% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Carbon, activated, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Multisorb Technologies Equipment Systems Group: 2.1 TCR = 64% of Carbon, activated, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Multisorb Technologies Equipment Systems Group safety composite

Multisorb Technologies Equipment Systems Group scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.8

2016→2019

Multisorb Technologies Equipment Systems Group injury rate improved

Multisorb Technologies Equipment Systems Group's TCR fell 3.8 from 3.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.7 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.8 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325998 · Cheektowaga, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 64% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/18
  • PHOTO GGTW, LLC dba South …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GGTW, LLC dba South Bay Salt Works (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Multisorb Technologies Equipment Systems Group in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Multisorb Technologies Equipment Systems Group averages 2.1 TCR (64% of the Carbon, activated, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Multisorb Technologies Equipment Systems Group TCR series: 2016=3.8 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Multisorb Technologies Equipment Systems Group falls in its industry

485 Carbon, activated, manufacturi establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 18 Carbon, activated, manufacturi employers in New York.

Multisorb Technologies Equipment Systems Group (21 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Multisorb Technologies Equipment Systems Group
Multisorb Technologies Equipment Systems Group (21 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Multisorb Technologies Equipment Systems Group has fewer employees than the Carbon, activated, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 4.7 4.7 2 0 0
2016 3.8 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325998 · NY · Cheektowaga

485 Carbon, activated, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 150 employers in Cheektowaga, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GGTW, LLC dba South Bay Salt Works 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Spartanburg, SC 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Struktol Company of America, LLC (2) 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR ChemTreat - Ashland, VA 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Chambers Valley Farms, Inc. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mulligan Family Farm LLC 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dziedzic Farms LLC 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pine Hollow Dairy LLC 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Office of Field Operations - Buffalo 1,643 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health Force 548 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sisters of Charity Hospital, St. Joseph Campus 457 FTE
CITY-NEAR Visiting Nurses Association - Erie 407 FTE
NAT-TCR Porta Cusd #202 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR #85 Art Van Great Lakes Xing 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Frattallone's Ace Hardware-Columbia Heights 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Chadwick Service Company 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Millierae8 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rubber City Machinery Corp. 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Miner North Texas 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Agrex Inc 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.