Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Washington

Murano Senior Living

Seattle, WA · ~100 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Murano Senior Living runs at 244% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Murano Senior Living: 9.3 TCR = 244% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Murano Senior Living safety composite

Murano Senior Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 9.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Murano Senior Living: 8.3 → 10.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 10.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.74× in 2024

Murano Senior Living's TCR rose 1.9 from 8.3 in 2020 to 10.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Seattle, WA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.3 · 244% of ind

  • DART 6.8 DART
  • RANK #102/216
  • PHOTO The Villages at Fore…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~100 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Villages at Forest Springs (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Murano Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Murano Senior Living averages 9.3 TCR (244% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Murano Senior Living TCR series: 2020=8.3 · 2024=10.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Murano Senior Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #102 safest of 216 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Washington.

Murano Senior Living (100 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Murano Senior Living
Murano Senior Living (100 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Murano Senior Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.3 6.8 9 0 0
2020 8.3 6.2 1 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · WA · Seattle

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 1,279 employers in Seattle, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Villages at Forest Springs 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR EB Care at Farmingville 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Annandale Senior Services, LLC 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maybelle Carter 9.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Flower World Inc 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Big Creek Fisheries, LLC 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lakeside Industries - Greater Seattle 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stacy and Witbeck/Kiewit/Hoffman, A Joint Venture - L200 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Seattle 32,378 FTE
CITY-NEAR The United States of America 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR Starz Entertainment 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Medical Center - Montlake and NW 11,307 FTE
NAT-TCR Modesto Springhill Suite 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Haven Steel Products 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR EB Care at Farmingville 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 2489 Val38 9.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE El Monte Sagrado 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Honorage Nursing Center 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Beloit Traffic Center 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arlington Plant 100 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.