General warehousing and storage · Minnesota

Murphy Logistics Solutions - Minneapolis

Minneapolis, MN · ~84 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Murphy Logistics Solutions - Minneapolis runs at 44% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade A.

Murphy Logistics Solutions - Minneapolis: 2.5 TCR = 44% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Murphy Logistics Solutions - Minneapolis safety composite

Murphy Logistics Solutions - Minneapolis scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Murphy Logistics Solutions - Minneapolis: 2.2 → 3.2 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 6.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.83× in 2023

Murphy Logistics Solutions - Minneapolis's TCR rose 1.0 from 2.2 in 2019 to 3.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 6.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.83× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Minneapolis, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.5 · 44% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #25/83
  • PHOTO Sysco Guest Supply L…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~84 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sysco Guest Supply LLC. (309 Kennedy Drive, Sayreville, NJ) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Murphy Logistics Solutions - Minneapolis in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Murphy Logistics Solutions - Minneapolis averages 2.5 TCR (44% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Murphy Logistics Solutions - Minneapolis TCR series: 2019=2.2 · 2020=1.2 · 2021=6.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=3.2 · BLS 5.8

Where Murphy Logistics Solutions - Minneapolis falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 83 General warehousing and storag employers in Minnesota.

Murphy Logistics Solutions - Minneapolis (84 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Murphy Logistics Solutions - Minneapolis
Murphy Logistics Solutions - Minneapolis (84 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Murphy Logistics Solutions - Minneapolis has fewer employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.2 2.1 3 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 6.1 2.5 5 0 0
2020 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2019 2.2 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · MN · Minneapolis

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sysco Guest Supply LLC. (309 Kennedy Drive, Sayreville, NJ) 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR LaGrou DesPlaines 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 50079 - CAPSTONE UNFI LANCASTER 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Terminal Corporation - Pt. Breeze 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Newport Service Center 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Global Specialty Contractors, Inc. 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE OlympiaTech Electric 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE South Office 84 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Mt Airy Office 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Aviator 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Food City 124 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR IFF Gibson City 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Memphis TN Branch 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Van Wert Manor 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Georgetown Hauling Operations and Sanitary Landfill 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE PF Carthage SNFOps, LLC 84 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.