Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities · Michigan

Muskegon PACE

Muskegon, MI · ~167 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Muskegon PACE runs at 269% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Muskegon PACE: 10.2 TCR = 269% of Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Muskegon PACE safety composite

Muskegon PACE scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
F 30.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Muskegon PACE: 0.0 → 30.6 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 30.6 TCR · DART/TCR 3× in 2024

Muskegon PACE's TCR rose 30.6 from 0.0 in 2022 to 30.6 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Muskegon, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 10.2 · 269% of ind

  • DART 30.6 DART
  • RANK #18/22
  • PHOTO Home Care of L&J Co …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~167 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Home Care of L&J Co Iowa (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Muskegon PACE in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Muskegon PACE averages 10.2 TCR (269% of the Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Muskegon PACE TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=30.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Muskegon PACE falls in its industry

1,320 Activity centers for disabled establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 22 Activity centers for disabled employers in Michigan.

Muskegon PACE (167 employees, TCR 10.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Muskegon PACE
Muskegon PACE (167 employees, TCR 10.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Muskegon PACE has more employees than the Activity centers for disabled persons, t median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 30.6 30.6 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · MI · Muskegon

1,320 Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 230 employers in Muskegon, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Home Care of L&J Co Iowa 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR E&S/Transportation 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Livingston CareGivers 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR SCHAS 10.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ridgeview Packing, LLC 167 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bouma Corporation: Grand Rapids 167 FTE
STATE-SIZE AkzoNobel VR Pontiac 167 FTE
STATE-SIZE Woodbridge Group 167 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Partners - Sherman Campus 3,461 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Partners-1500 E Sherman BLVD-MH-MI 2,598 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Partners - Hackley 1,329 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Arena 861 FTE
NAT-TCR Richmond Warehouse 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Brandel Manor 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Falcon Farms- Az 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Uc Health Broomfield Hosp Food 10.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dia Art Foundation 167 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6407 Mayaguez 167 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alem Werks LLC 167 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heritage Campus Green Hills OPCO LLC 167 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.