Air conditioning equipment except motor vehicle manufacturing · Ohio

NA Mfg Dearborn

Columbus, OH · ~589 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

NA Mfg Dearborn runs at 13% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Air conditioning equipment except motor vehicle manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

NA Mfg Dearborn: 0.4 TCR = 13% of Air conditioning equipment except motor vehicle manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

NA Mfg Dearborn safety composite

NA Mfg Dearborn scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

82/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2018→2024

NA Mfg Dearborn injury rate improved

NA Mfg Dearborn's TCR fell 1.3 from 1.3 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.3 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=0.4 · 2022=0.2 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333415 · Columbus, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 13% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/22
  • PHOTO Comm HVAC NA and EME…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~589 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : MFG-Grand Rapids MI-USA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

NA Mfg Dearborn in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows NA Mfg Dearborn averages 0.4 TCR (13% of the Air conditioning equipment except motor vehicle manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

NA Mfg Dearborn TCR series: 2018=1.3 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=0.4 · 2022=0.2 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where NA Mfg Dearborn falls in its industry

461 Air conditioning equipment ex establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 22 Air conditioning equipment ex employers in Ohio.

NA Mfg Dearborn (589 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 164 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate NA Mfg Dearborn
NA Mfg Dearborn (589 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 164 employees and a TCR of 2.8

NA Mfg Dearborn has more employees than the Air conditioning equipment except motor median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.2 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.4 0.0 2 0 0
2020 0.5 0.5 2 0 0
2019 0.6 0.4 3 0 0
2018 1.3 0.7 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333415 · OH · Columbus

461 Air conditioning equipment except motor vehicle manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,500 employers in Columbus, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : MFG-Grand Rapids MI-USA 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plymouth South 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR SP Industries, Inc. Stone Ridge, New York 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Everidge, Inc. Plymouth 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE OH1-LPZ-OH1 CORPORATE OFFICE 589 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mane Inc. Lebanon Production 588 FTE
STATE-SIZE LBrands - Morse Campus 588 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ground Penetrating Radar Systems, LLC 588 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nationwide Children's Hospital 13,367 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nationwide Children's Hospital Main Campus 10,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Methodist Hospital 9,759 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CMH1 5,057 FTE
NAT-TCR Mobile Branch 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Milliken Pendleton Plant 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR FMG Concrete Cutting 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Tejas Production Services 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Empire Merchants, LLC - Brooklyn 589 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northern CA Install 589 FTE
NAT-SIZE Roxborough Memorial Hospital 589 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fresh From Texas 589 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.